Literature DB >> 19059581

Sensory and affective judgments of skin during inter- and intrapersonal touch.

Steve Guest1, Greg Essick, Jean Marc Dessirier, Kevin Blot, Kannapon Lopetcharat, Francis McGlone.   

Abstract

Here we report two experiments that investigated the tactile perception of one's own skin (intrapersonal touch) versus the skin of other individuals (interpersonal touch). In the first experiment, thirteen female participants rated, along four perceptual attributes, the skin of their own palm and volar forearm, then that of several of the other participants. Ratings were made using visual analogue scales for perceived smoothness, softness, stickiness, and pleasantness. One's own skin was rated less pleasant than the skin of others. For both intra- and interpersonal touch, the forearm skin was rated smoother, softer, less sticky and more pleasant than the palmar skin. In the second experiment, ten pairs of female participants rated each other's palm and volar forearm skin, with the skin of the touched individual being assessed before and after the application of skin emollients that alter skin feel. As in the first experiment, the untreated skin of others was rated more pleasant than the participants' own skin, and the forearm versus palm differences were replicated. However, the emollient had generally larger effects on self-assessments than the assessments of others, and the site effect showed greater positive sensory and pleasantness increases for palm versus volar forearm. The disparate results of the two experiments suggest that attention, influenced by the ecological importance of the stimulus, is more important to assessment of touched skin than ownership of the skin or the contribution to self-touch made by the additional receptors in the passively touched skin. In both experiments, the pleasantness of touched skin was associated with the skin's perceived smoothness and softness, with weak trends toward negative associations with its perceived stickiness, consistent with prior research using inanimate surfaces (e.g., textiles and sandpapers).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19059581     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  14 in total

1.  Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch.

Authors:  Valeria Gazzola; Michael L Spezio; Joset A Etzel; Fulvia Castelli; Ralph Adolphs; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The skin as a social organ.

Authors:  India Morrison; Line S Löken; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceptual and neural response to affective tactile texture stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Steve Guest; Mary Beth Nebel; Jonathan Weisner; Grace T Baranek; Gregory K Essick
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Thin Films on the Skin, but not Frictional Agents, Attenuate the Percept of Pleasantness to Brushed Stimuli.

Authors:  Merat Rezaei; Saad S Nagi; Chang Xu; Sarah McIntyre; Håkan Olausson; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  World Haptics Conf       Date:  2021-08-23

7.  The brain's response to pleasant touch: an EEG investigation of tactile caressing.

Authors:  Harsimrat Singh; Markus Bauer; Wojtek Chowanski; Yi Sui; Douglas Atkinson; Sharon Baurley; Martin Fry; Joe Evans; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Karin Saar; Francis McGlone; Helena Backlund Wasling
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Physical factors influencing pleasant touch during tactile exploration.

Authors:  Anne Klöcker; Michael Wiertlewski; Vincent Théate; Vincent Hayward; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physical factors influencing pleasant touch during passive fingertip stimulation.

Authors:  Anne Klöcker; Calogero Maria Oddo; Domenico Camboni; Massimo Penta; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.