Literature DB >> 20850418

Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.

Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien1, Carmel Levitan, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Vision tends to dominate over touch in the majority of experimental situations, particularly when visual information is presented on, or near to, the body. We combined two visual dominance paradigms in order to investigate crossmodal interactions between vision and touch for stimuli on versus off the body: 1) The Colavita visual dominance effect, which has recently been extended to vision and touch, and 2) The rubber hand illusion, which has often been used to probe visuotactile interactions. Specifically, we investigated whether moving a visual stimulus off the participant's body would affect visual dominance, and how this dominance would be mediated by the presence/absence of a rubber hand (given the rubber hand illusion provides a way of extending the representation of one's own body in space). Participants made speeded detection/discrimination responses to a random sequence of visual-only, tactile-only, and visuotactile targets. While participants responded near-perfectly on the unimodal target trials, their performance on the visuotactile target trials was deleteriously affected by the simultaneous presentation of a visual stimulus on (as opposed to away from) their body. In particular, when the visual stimulus was presented to their fingertip, participants failed to respond to far more of the tactile than visual stimuli on bimodal trials. The magnitude of this visual dominance effect decreased significantly when the visual stimulus was moved off the body. When a rubber hand was placed at the off-body location, a similar (albeit reduced) visual dominance effect was observed in both positions. These results therefore suggest that visuotactile interactions are strongest when visual stimuli are presented on a body (no matter whom that body, or body-part, belongs to). Crown
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20850418     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  7 in total

1.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual-auditory interactions on explicit and implicit information processing.

Authors:  L Y Lo; C C Lai
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  The arousing power of everyday materials: an analysis of the physiological and behavioral responses to visually and tactually presented textures.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Peter König
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-03-31

5.  Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Supriya Murali; Scott Sinnett; Peter König
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Do bodily expressions compete with facial expressions? Time course of integration of emotional signals from the face and the body.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Gu; Xiaoqin Mai; Yue-jia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Olfactory Influences on Visual Categorization: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Hörberg; Maria Larsson; Ingrid Ekström; Camilla Sandöy; Peter Lundén; Jonas K Olofsson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.