Literature DB >> 30267139

Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Roberta Etzi1, Massimiliano Zampini2,3, Georgiana Juravle4, Alberto Gallace5.   

Abstract

Considering the wealth of recent studies on affective touch, to date, little research addressed the role of the other sensory modalities in the modulation of hedonic tactile perception. Here, we investigated the behavioral and electrodermal signature of the interaction between simultaneously presented visual and tactile stimuli. In three experiments, participants were presented with emotional pictures (international affective picture system; IAPS), while their forearm was gently stroked by means of different tactile textures (i.e., sandpaper, satin, tinfoil, abrasive sponge, and skin-to-skin contact). In Experiment 1, the participants evaluated the pleasantness of the tactile stimulation received, while in Experiment 2 they evaluated the pictures emotional valence. In Experiment 3 the participants rated the pleasantness, the smoothness and the softness of the textures; skin conductance responses (SCRs) were also measured. In sum, the results revealed that while the visual valence ratings were not modulated by the tactile stimulation, the hedonic and sensory tactile ratings were modulated by the visual presentation of both positively and negatively valenced pictures, as well as by neutral pictures. The modulatory effects occurring during visuo-tactile interactions might thus be not necessarily reciprocal. Moreover, the SCRs were not differently affected by the visuo-tactile or tactile conditions of stimulus presentation, suggesting a dissociation between behavioral and electrodermal effects in multisensory interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT afferents; Hedonic touch; IAPS pictures; Multisensory interaction; Skin conductance response

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30267139     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5386-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  79 in total

Review 1.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch.

Authors:  Ilanit Gordon; Avery C Voos; Randi H Bennett; Danielle Z Bolling; Kevin A Pelphrey; Martha D Kaiser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Touching and feeling: differences in pleasant touch processing between glabrous and hairy skin in humans.

Authors:  F McGlone; H Olausson; J A Boyle; M Jones-Gotman; C Dancer; S Guest; G Essick
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Laura Miccoli; Miguel A Escrig; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Sensory and affective judgments of skin during inter- and intrapersonal touch.

Authors:  Steve Guest; Greg Essick; Jean Marc Dessirier; Kevin Blot; Kannapon Lopetcharat; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-12-06

6.  Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans.

Authors:  Line S Löken; Johan Wessberg; India Morrison; Francis McGlone; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity.

Authors:  Chantal Triscoli; Ilona Croy; Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen; Håkan Olausson; Uta Sailer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Vicarious responses to social touch in posterior insular cortex are tuned to pleasant caressing speeds.

Authors:  India Morrison; Malin Björnsdotter; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity.

Authors:  Karen M Grewen; Bobbi J Anderson; Susan S Girdler; Kathleen C Light
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.104

10.  Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions.

Authors:  Chantal Triscoli; Rochelle Ackerley; Uta Sailer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.