| Literature DB >> 26771591 |
Francisco J Luna-Vázquez1, César Ibarra-Alvarado2, Alejandra Rojas-Molina3, Antonio Romo-Mancillas4, Fabián H López-Vallejo5, Mariana Solís-Gutiérrez6, Juana I Rojas-Molina7, Fausto Rivero-Cruz8.
Abstract
The present research aimed to isolate the non-polar secondary metabolites that produce the vasodilator effects induced by the dichloromethane extract of Prunus serotina (P. serotina) fruits and to determine whether the NO/cGMP and the H2S/KATP channel pathways are involved in their mechanism of action. A bioactivity-directed fractionation of the dichloromethane extract of P. serotina fruits led to the isolation of ursolic acid and uvaol as the main non-polar vasodilator compounds. These compounds showed significant relaxant effect on rat aortic rings in an endothelium- and concentration-dependent manner, which was inhibited by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), DL-propargylglycine (PAG) and glibenclamide (Gli). Additionally, both triterpenes increased NO and H2S production in aortic tissue. Molecular docking studies showed that ursolic acid and uvaol are able to bind to endothelial NOS and CSE with high affinity for residues that form the oligomeric interface of both enzymes. These results suggest that the vasodilator effect produced by ursolic acid and uvaol contained in P. serotina fruits, involves activation of the NO/cGMP and H2S/KATP channel pathways, possibly through direct activation of NOS and CSE.Entities:
Keywords: Prunus serotina; hydrogen sulfide; in silico study; nitric oxide; ursolic acid; uvaol; vasodilation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26771591 PMCID: PMC6273102 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21010078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Diagram for extraction and bio-guided fractionation of the dichloromethane extract of Prunus serotina fruits.
Figure 2Chemical structures of ursolic acid (A) and uvaol (B).
Spectroscopic constants of ursolic acid.
| 1H-NMR (400 MHz, Acetone) δ (ppm) | δH 5.22 (1H, m, H-12), 3.15 (1H, m, H-3), 2.25 (1H, d, H-18), 1.13 (3H, s, H-23), 0.98 (3H, s, H-27), 0.96 (3H, s, H-26), 0.95 (3H, s, H-24), 0.89 (3H, d, H-29), 0.84 (3H, d, H-30), 0.78 (3H, s, H-25) |
| 13C-NMR (400 MHz, Acetone) δ (ppm) | δC 177.6 (C-28), 138.4 (C-13), 125.3 (C-12), 77.7 (C-3), 55.3 (C-5), 52.9 (C-18), 47.5 (C-9), 47.3 (C-17), 41.9 (C-14), 39.5 (C-8), 38.9 (C-19), 38.9 (C-4), 38.6 (C-1), 36.8 (C-22), 36.7 (C-10), 33.0 (C-7), 30.4 (C-21), 27.9 (C-15), 27.8 (C-2), 24.1 (C-16), 23.1 (C-27), 23.0 (C-11), 20.5 (C-30), 18.2 (C-6), 16.8 (C-26), 16.6 (C-24), 15.4 (C-29), 15.0 (C-25) |
Spectroscopic constants of uvaol.
| 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- | δH 5.13 (1H, t, H-12), 3.80 (1H, d, H-20a), 3.38 (1H, d, H-28b), 3.20 (1H, d, H-3), 1.05 (3H, s, CH3), 0.98 (3H, s, CH3), 0.97 (3H, s, CH3), 0.96 (3H, s, CH3), 0.93 (3H, d, CH3), 0.83 (3H, d, CH3), 0.80 (3H, s, CH3). |
| 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO- | δC 177.8 (C-28),138.7 (C-13), 125.1 (C-12), 77.1 (C-3), 58.7 (C-18), 52.3 (C-5), 41.5 (C-14).17.9 (C-29), 15.9 (C-23). |
Figure 3Concentration-response curves of the vasodilator effect of ursolic acid and uvaol in the presence (E+) and absence (E−) of endothelium. Acetylcholine (ACh) was used as positive control. Analysis by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was made between the curves of each triterpene in the presence and absence of endothelium (p < 0.001).
Figure 4Vasodilatory effect of ursolic acid and uvaol in the absence (control) and presence of inhibitors of enzymes that produce gasotransmitters: NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME; 100 μM) and dl-propargylglycine (PAG; 10 mM). Analysis by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was made between the curves of each triterpene in the presence of l-NAME or PAG (p < 0.001).
Figure 5Vasodilatory effect of ursolic acid and uvaol in the absence (control) and presence of inhibitors of enzymes that produce gasotransmitters: l-NAME (1 μM), PAG (1 mM), and l-NAME (1 μM) + PAG (1 mM). Analysis by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was made between the curves of each triterpene in the presence of l-NAME, PAG or l-NAME + PAG (p < 0.001).
Figure 6Vasodilatory effect of ursolic acid and uvaol in the absence (control) and presence of the potassium channel inhibitor glibenclamide (1 µM). Analysis by repeated-measures two-way ANOVA was made between the curves of each triterpene in the presence of glibenclamide (p < 0.001).
Figure 7Total nitrite (A) and hydrogen sulfide (B) concentration induced by stimulation of aortic tissue with ursolic acid and uvaol. Statistical analysis was made using a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey’s test (* p < 0.0001 vs. control; # p < 0.05 vs. ACh).
Figure 8Molecular surface showing the oligomeric interfaces (color-code by chain) and the favored binding sites of triterpenes (Ursolic acid): (A) eNOS and (B) CSE. The homodimer interface is located along the region where the two monomers, labeled in different colors, connect.
Figure 9Binding mode of ursolic acid and uvaol into the eNOS binding site: (A) short interactions (4.5 Å) of ursolic acid into the C1 and C2 pockets; (B) 2D ligand interaction diagram of ursolic acid; (C) Short interactions (4.5 Å) of uvaol into the C1 and C2 pockets; and (D) 2D ligand interaction diagram of uvaol.
Figure 10Binding mode of ursolic acid and uvaol into the CSE shared binding site: (A) short interactions (4.5 Å) of ursolic acid into the binding site; (B) 2D ligand interaction diagram of ursolic acid; (C) Short interactions (4.5 Å) of uvaol into the binding site; and (D) 2D ligand interaction diagram of uvaol.