| Literature DB >> 32630652 |
Aleksandra Telichowska1,2, Joanna Kobus-Cisowska1, Piotr Szulc3.
Abstract
Wild cherry is a plant observed in the form of trees or shrubs. This species comprises about twenty kinds of plants and the most popular are two, Prunus padus L. and Prunus serotina L., whose properties and content of phytochemical compounds are subject to studies. Wild cherry contains many active compounds, including tocopherols, vitamins, polyphenols and terpenes, which can have beneficial effects on health. On the other hand, wild cherry contains cyanogenic glycosides. Nevertheless, current research results indicate pro-health properties associated with both P. serotina and P. padus. The aim of this study was to collect and present the current state of knowledge about wild cherry and to review available in vitro and in vivo studies concerning its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antidiabetic activity. Moreover, the current work presents and characterizes phytochemical content in the leaves, bark and fruits of P. padus and P. serotina and compiles data that indicate their health-promoting and functional properties and possibilities of using them to improve health. We find that the anatomical parts of P. padus and P. serotina can be a valuable raw material used in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries as a source of bioactive compounds with multi-directional action.Entities:
Keywords: Prunus padus; Prunus serotina; anti-inflammatory; antibacterial; antioxidant; bird cherry; cyanogenic glycosides; phytochemical compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32630652 PMCID: PMC7399899 DOI: 10.3390/nu12071966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Systematics of the species belonging to genus Prunus L.
| Domain | Eukaryota |
|---|---|
| Kingdom | Plantae |
| Clade | Vascular plants |
| Clade | Seed plants |
| Class | Angiosperms |
| Clade | Rosids |
| Order | Rosales |
| Family | Rosaceae |
| Genus | Prunus |
Comparison of botanical characteristics of P. padus and P. serotina [6].
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | Europe, Asia Minor | North America |
| Height of trees | up to 15 m | up to 25 m |
| Leaves | Smaller, finely serrated | Elongated, sharpened, more serrated |
| Veins network (leaves) | Dense | Poorly visible |
| Fruits | Bitter | Sweeter |
| Flowering | April/May | May/June |
| Inflorescence | Suspended or rarely elevated | Elevated or ascending |
| Fruits | Petals broadly inversely egg-shaped, 10–15 mm long, almost twice as long as stamens. Hairy flower bottom. | The serrated edges of the calyx are permanent and remain on the fruit. The fruit is unripe pink or reddish, then dark red to black. Smooth pip |
| Bark, aroma | The bark smells good. Torn buds smell like almonds. | Torn bark with a characteristic, sharp, relatively pleasant smell, similar to that of blackcurrant. |
Nutrition value and mineral content in P. padus i P. serotina.
| Class | Component | [ | [ | [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Fruits | Fruits | Seeds Raw | Seeds Toasted | ||
| Moisture | 81.18 ± 0.081 | 8.92 ± 0.42 | 10.75 ± 0.35 | ||
| Ash | 0.86 ± 0.11% | 3.19 ± 0.18 | 2.72 ± 0.21 | ||
| Mineral | Ca | 12.90 ± 1.90 | 192.30 ± 0.58 | 127.11 ± 17.51 | |
| Fe | 9.49 ± 0.3 | 1.21 ± 0.003 | |||
| Mg | 21.20 ± 0.20 | 249.15 ± 0.34 | 216.68 ± 18.75 | ||
| P | 28.10 ± 0.40 | 439.0 ± 0.16 | 323.40 ± 0.14 | ||
| K | 184.30 ± 3.50 | 873.22 ± 12.64 | 454.82 ± 0.41 | ||
| Zn | 3.40 ± 0.10 | 2.96 ± 0.24 | |||
| Na | 22.40 ± 1.60 | 82.98 ± 0.90 | 23.59 ± 0.8 | ||
| Protein | 2.10 ± 0.01 | 37 ± 0.16 | 36.55 ± 0.22 | ||
| Aminoacid | Asp | 112.29 mg/g | 116.97 mg/g | ||
| Glu | 256.84 mg/g | 27.73 mg/g | |||
| Ser | 32.84 mg/g | 42.11 mg/g | |||
| His | 21.60 mg/g | 21.29 mg/g | |||
| Gly | 37.43 mg/g | 38.82 mg/g | |||
| Thr | 52.85 mg/g | 59.16 mg/g | |||
| Arg | 84.24 mg/g | 87.42 mg/g | |||
| Ala | 41.47 mg/g | 44.06 mg/g | |||
| Tyr | 48.75 mg/g | 60.99 mg/g | |||
| Met | 8.93 mg/g | 9.83 mg/g | |||
| Val | 45.48 mg/g | 45.62 mg/g | |||
| Phe | 48.64 mg/g | 52.00 mg/g | |||
| Ile | 39.17 mg/g | 40.33 mg/g | |||
| Leu | 75.10 mg/g | 82.11 mg/g | |||
| Lys | 8.85 mg/g | 11.17 mg/g | |||
| Fat | Total | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 40.37 ± 0.73 | 39.97 ± 0.20 | |
| Carbohydrates | 129.28 ± 3.47 | 12.23 ± 0.79 | 7.76 ± 2.24 | 8.65 ± 4.28 | |
| Sugars | Glucose | 62.19 ± 1.92 | |||
| Fructose | 33.34 ± 1.32 | ||||
| Sorbitol | 33.73 ± 1.51 | ||||
| Crude Fiber | 3.58 ± 0.03 | 10.73 ± 1.49 | 12.12 ± 4.06 | ||
ND—not detected.
Phytocompounds content in P. padus and P. serotina.
| Class | Component | Result | Species | Plant Part | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorophyll | Chlorophyll A | 42.58 ± 1.92 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Chlorophyll B | 22.43 ± 1.30 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Alfa-Caroten | 0.05 ± 0.01 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Beta-Caroten | 3.06 ± 0.17 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Anthocyanins | Cyanidin-2-galactoside | 33.69 ± 2.52 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Cyanidin-3-glucoside | 1501.53 ± 61.32 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 272 mg/100 g |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Cyanidin-3-rutinoside | 623.68 ± 46.97 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Cyanidin rhamnosyl hexoside | 13.09 ± 1.00 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Tocopherols | Tocopherol alfa | 6.51 ± 0.50 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Tocopherol gama | 1.35 ± 0.12 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Tocopherol delta | 2.48 ± 0.22 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Vitamin C | Ascorbic acid | 25.20 ± 3.48 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Dehydroascorbic acid | 50.87 ± 16.23 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Terpen | Limonene | 31.40 ± 5.65 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Phellandrene | 8.51 ± 2.69 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Sabinene | 1.21 ± 0.18 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| γ-terpinene | 65.52 ± 6.25 mg/100 FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Ursolic acid | X |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Uvaol | X |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Cis-Linalool oxide | 0.7% |
| Flowers | [ | |
| Trans s-Linalool oxide | 0.1% |
| Flowers | [ | |
| (Z)-8-Hydroxylinalool | 30.4% |
| Flowers | [ | |
| (E)-β-Farnesene | 0.2% |
| Flowers | [ | |
| (E, E)-α-Farnesene | 0.1% |
| Flowers | [ |
X—component is present in the sample.
Polyphenolic compounds in wild cherries (P. padus and P. serotina).
| Class | Component | Result | Species | Plant Part | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cinnamic acid derivatives | Caffeic acid | 6.61 ± 1.35 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Chlorogenic acid | 10.48 ± 0.28 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 1.39–1.94% DW |
| Flowers | [ | ||
| Coumaric acid | 12.20 ± 3.07 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Ferulic acid | 10.45 ± 3.65 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 5- | 16.14 ± 1.11 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 5- | 2.25 ± 0.05 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Caffeic acid hexoside1 | 11.71 ± 1.45 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| p-Coumaric acid hexoside 1 | 10.25 ± 1.00 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 5-Caffeoylquinic acid 1 | 357.30 ± 14.08 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 5-Caffeolquinic acid 2 | 48.25 ± 1.70 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 15.40 ± 1.08 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Hydroxy-benzoic Acid derivatives | Ellagic acid | 11.41 ± 1.25 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Gallic acid | 3.54 ± 0.81 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Vanillic acid | X |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Flavones | Apigenin rhamnoside | 24.99 ± 1.61 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Flavonols | Hyperoside | 7.38 ± 0.41 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| 0.15–0.23% DW |
| Flowers | [ | ||
| Quercetin | 11.86 ± 2.36 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 1.37–1.56% DW |
| Flowers | [ | ||
| Quercitrin | 16.37 ± 3.51 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Rutin | 2.67 ± 1.02 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Quercetin acetyl hexoside | 2.48 ± 0.09 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin dihexoside | 7.49 ± 0.54 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin hexosyl pentoside 3 | 223.45 ± 10.20 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Quercetin-3-galactoside | 52.80 ± 1.41 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin-3-glucoside | 21.40 ± 1.34 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin-3-rhamnoside | 1.98 ± 0.38 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin-3-rutinosie | 64.70 ± 21.18 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quercetin 3-O-β-galactopyranoside | X |
| Flowers | [ | |
| Quercetin diglycosides | 1.74–1.91% DW |
| Spring leaves | [ | |
| 1.67–1.78% DW |
| Flowers | [ | ||
| Isorhamnetin-3-rutinoside | 1.22 ± 0.03 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Isorhamnetin diglycoside | 0.36–0.59% DW |
| Flowers | [ | |
| Kaempferol hexoside pentoside | 0.72 ± 0.03 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Kaempferol hexoside 1 | 1.06 ± 0.14 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Kaempferol hexoside 2 (glu) | 1.43 ± 0.05 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| X |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Kaempferl-3-rutinoside | 2.81 ± 0.29 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Catechins | Epicatechin | 25.43 ± 3.16 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| 95.22 ± 10.60 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Catechin | 56.66 ± 16.88 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Tannins | Castalagin | 53.95 ± 8.90 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| Vescalagin | 26.66 ± 5.97 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Organic acids | Citric acid | 217.24 ± 14.95 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ |
| 24.76 ± 1.32 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Oxalic acid | 12.16 ± 2.19 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Quinic acid | 324.48 ± 57.21 mg/100g FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| 6.45 ± 0.25 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | ||
| Malic acid | 18.71 ± 0.81 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Shikimic acid | 2.66 ± 0.16 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ | |
| Fumaric acid | 80.08 ± 3.19 mg/kg FW |
| Fruits | [ |
X—component is present in the sample
Cyanogenic glycosides: amygdalin content in different species.
| Species | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 20.95 ± 0.25 mg/g | [ | |
| 6.37 mg/g (oil) | [ | |
| 0.12 ± 0.06 mg/g | [ | |
| 50.76 ± 0.92 µg/mL | [ | |
| 118 (29) µmol HCN equivalents/g DW | [ | |
| 6.7 (ppm) | [ | |
| 17.49 ± 0.26 mg/g | [ | |
| 10.00 ± 0.14 mg/g | [ | |
| 6.81 ± 0.02 mg/g | [ | |
| 3.89 ± 0.31 mg/g | [ | |
| 2.68 ± 0.02 mg/g | [ | |
| 0.12 ± 0.01 mg/g | [ |
HCN—Hydrogen Cyanide, DW—dry weight.
In vitro and in vivo activity of P. padus and P. serotina.
| Activity | Method | Extract | Species | Plant Part | Organism | Result/Observed Effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioxidant Activity | FRAP | Acetone |
| Frozen Fruits | 31.54 ± 0.26 mM trolox/kg | [ | |
| FRAP | Methanol |
| Fruits | 17.78 ± 0.84 mmol Fe 2+x kg−1 | [ | ||
| FRAP | Methanol |
| Leaves | 100μg/mL (concentration) 0.34 ± 0.04 μg/mL | [ | ||
| FRAP | Methanol |
| Leaves | 200 μg/mL (concentration) 0.62 ± 0.01 μg/mL | [ | ||
| FRAP | Methanol |
| Leaves | 300 μg/mL (concentration) 0.88 ± 0.00 μg/mL | [ | ||
| FRAP | Methanol |
| Branch | 100μg/mL (concentration) 0.51 ± 0.01 | [ | ||
| Methanol |
| Branch | 200 μg/mL (concentration) 0.74 ± 0.01 | [ | |||
| Methanol |
| Branch | 300 μg/mL (concentration) 0.99 ± 0.00 | [ | |||
| FRAP | Water |
| Fresh Fruits | 1455.2 ± 92.5 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| FRAP | Water |
| Flesh Fruits | 1100.7 ± 35.4 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| FRAP | Water |
| Peel Fruits | 1991.4 ± 40.1 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Flowers | 1.43–1.49 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Autumn Leaves | 1.68 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Spring Leaves | 2.10–2.29 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Summer Leaves | 1.81–1.93 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Flowers | 1.78–1.84 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Autumn Leaves | 2.49 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Spring Leaves | 4.27–4.92 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Methanol |
| Summer Leaves | 3.12–3.95 g g−1 | [ | ||
| DPPH | Water |
| Fresh Fruits | 2056.7 ± 108.0 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| DPPH | Water |
| Flesh Fruits | 1764.6 ± 170.4 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| DPPH | Water |
| Peel Fruits | 2681.6 ± 180.0 μmol TE/100 g of FW | [ | ||
| Antimicrobial | MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 250 μg/mL | [ |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| 500 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 125 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| >1000μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 250 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 500 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| 500 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 500 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 500 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| >1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Branch |
| 1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Leaves |
| 1000 μg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Dichloromethane |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 mg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 × 10−2 mg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 × 10−2 mg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 × 10−4 mg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Dichloromethane |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 mg/mL | [ | |
| MIC | Methanol |
| Seeds |
| 1.0 × 10−2 mg/mL | [ | |
| Antidiabetic | The α-glucosidase inhibitory effect | Methanol |
| Leaves | 1.0 ± 0.1 µg/mL | [ | |
| The α-glucosidase inhibitory effect | Methanol |
| Branch | 82.7 ± 4.2 µg/mL | [ | ||
| Cardiovascular activity | NOS Enzymatic activity assay | Dichloromethane |
| Fruits | Wistar male rats 250–300 g | Ursolic acid (EC50 = 21.5 ± 3.5 µg/mL; Emax = 97.7% ± 3.9%); Uvaol (EC50 = 19.3 ± 2.5 µg/mL; Emax = 93.4% ± 5.1%) caused a significant concentration-dependent relaxation of the aorta. ACh (EC50 = 8.7 ± 0.8 µg/mL; Emax = 69.5% ± 5.7%), used as positive control, was more potent than ursolic acid and uvaol, but showed lower efficacy than both triterpenes. The nitrite concentration increased, when aortic tissue was incubated with ursolic acid ((NO2′) = 7.95 ± 0.22µM) and uvaol ((NO2′) = 7.55 ± 0.17µM); both triterpenes induced a higher nitrite concentration than that of ACh ((NO2’) = 5.5 ± 0.47µM). Similarly, quantification of H2S showed that stimulation of aortic tissue with ursolic acid ((H2S) = 234 ± 12.7µM) and uvaol ((H2S) = 253 ± 6.8µM) increased four times the H2S concentration with respect to the control. In the presence of ACh, H2S levels were only three times higher than those of the control; the vasodilator effect produced by ursolic acid involves activation of the NO/cGMP and H2S/KATP channel pathways, possibly through direct activation of NOS and CSE. | [ |
| Anti-inflammatory-nociceptive properties | Measurement of iNOS enzyme activity Western blot analysis Trypsin-induced paw edema Acute toxicity test Tail immersion test Hot plate test Acetic acid-induced writhing test Formalin test | Methanol |
| Dried stem | ICR mice (6 weeks old) weighing 20–25 g and C57BL/6 mice (5 weeks old) weighing 18–22 g | Tested material delayed reaction times to a nociceptive stimulus 60 min after oral administration (38.61% at 250 mg/kg and 68.51% at 500 mg/kg, po0.001).The anti-nociceptive effects of MPP (250, 500 mg/kg) occurred between 30 and 90 min and maximum analgesia was reached at 60 min (37.98%, after 0.01 and 62.18%, after 0.001 respectively).The treatment with MPP induced a significant decrease in the number of writhing motions dose dependently (52.5% at 250 mg/kg, po0.001 and 72.8% at 500 mg/kg, po0.001). | [ |
DPPH—antioxidant activity with DPPH radicals (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), FRAP—ferric reducing antioxidant power, MIC—antimicrobial test (minimum inhibitory concentration assay). TE—Trolox equivalent, FW—fresh weight, NOS—inhibitor of NO synthase, CSE—inhibitor of cystathionine-γ-lyase, ICR—Institute of Cancer Research.