Literature DB >> 26760448

A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

William R Holmes1,2, Jennifer S Trueblood3,4, Andrew Heathcote5.   

Abstract

In the real world, decision making processes must be able to integrate non-stationary information that changes systematically while the decision is in progress. Although theories of decision making have traditionally been applied to paradigms with stationary information, non-stationary stimuli are now of increasing theoretical interest. We use a random-dot motion paradigm along with cognitive modeling to investigate how the decision process is updated when a stimulus changes. Participants viewed a cloud of moving dots, where the motion switched directions midway through some trials, and were asked to determine the direction of motion. Behavioral results revealed a strong delay effect: after presentation of the initial motion direction there is a substantial time delay before the changed motion information is integrated into the decision process. To further investigate the underlying changes in the decision process, we developed a Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model (PLBA). The PLBA is efficient to simulate, enabling it to be fit to participant choice and response-time distribution data in a hierarchal modeling framework using a non-parametric approximate Bayesian algorithm. Consistent with behavioral results, PLBA fits confirmed the presence of a long delay between presentation and integration of new stimulus information, but did not support increased response caution in reaction to the change. We also found the decision process was not veridical, as symmetric stimulus change had an asymmetric effect on the rate of evidence accumulation. Thus, the perceptual decision process was slow to react to, and underestimated, new contrary motion information.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence accumulation models; Hierarchal Bayesian inference; Non-stationary stimuli; Random-dot motion

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26760448      PMCID: PMC4874184          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  49 in total

1.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Practice increases the efficiency of evidence accumulation in perceptual choice.

Authors:  Scott Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Evaluating methods for approximating stochastic differential equations.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

9.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The influence of spatiotemporal structure of noisy stimuli in decision making.

Authors:  Andrea Insabato; Laura Dempere-Marco; Mario Pannunzi; Gustavo Deco; Ranulfo Romo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  16 in total

1.  Combining error-driven models of associative learning with evidence accumulation models of decision-making.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Hayley K Jach; Russell J Boag; Christina A Van Heer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  A cognitive model-based approach to testing mechanistic explanations for neuropsychological decrements during tobacco abstinence.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Andrew Heathcote; Larry Hawk; Nicolas J Schlienz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Optimal models of decision-making in dynamic environments.

Authors:  Zachary P Kilpatrick; William R Holmes; Tahra L Eissa; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Modeling evidence accumulation decision processes using integral equations: Urgency-gating and collapsing boundaries.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 8.247

6.  Dynamic Interplay of Value and Sensory Information in High-Speed Decision Making.

Authors:  Kivilcim Afacan-Seref; Natalie A Steinemann; Annabelle Blangero; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.

Authors:  Gustav Markkula; Zeynep Uludağ; Richard McGilchrist Wilkie; Jac Billington
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; Jennifer S Trueblood; William R Holmes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

9.  Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions.

Authors:  Silvia U Maier; Anjali Raja Beharelle; Rafael Polanía; Christian C Ruff; Todd A Hare
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-06-01

10.  Using Decision Models to Enhance Investigations of Individual Differences in Cognitive Neuroscience.

Authors:  Corey N White; Ryan A Curl; Jennifer F Sloane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.