Literature DB >> 24258272

A generalized, likelihood-free method for posterior estimation.

Brandon M Turner1, Per B Sederberg.   

Abstract

Recent advancements in Bayesian modeling have allowed for likelihood-free posterior estimation. Such estimation techniques are crucial to the understanding of simulation-based models, whose likelihood functions may be difficult or even impossible to derive. However, current approaches are limited by their dependence on sufficient statistics and/or tolerance thresholds. In this article, we provide a new approach that requires no summary statistics, error terms, or thresholds and is generalizable to all models in psychology that can be simulated. We use our algorithm to fit a variety of cognitive models with known likelihood functions to ensure the accuracy of our approach. We then apply our method to two real-world examples to illustrate the types of complex problems our method solves. In the first example, we fit an error-correcting criterion model of signal detection, whose criterion dynamically adjusts after every trial. We then fit two models of choice response time to experimental data: the linear ballistic accumulator model, which has a known likelihood, and the leaky competing accumulator model, whose likelihood is intractable. The estimated posterior distributions of the two models allow for direct parameter interpretation and model comparison by means of conventional Bayesian statistics-a feat that was not previously possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24258272      PMCID: PMC4143986          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0530-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  52 in total

1.  Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M T Seielstad; A Perez-Lezaun; M W Feldman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  QMPE: estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Scott Brown; Denis Cousineau
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-05

3.  Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models.

Authors:  Don van Ravenzwaaij; Han L J van der Maas; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Fitting wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: an example using functions for the S-PLUS package.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

Review 5.  Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition.

Authors:  Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Christopher Donkin; Mario Fific
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Some mathematical models in science.

Authors:  M Kac
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Decision making and confidence given uncertain advice.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Matthew J Dry
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-11-12

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  16 in total

1.  A computational analysis of flanker interference in depression.

Authors:  D G Dillon; T Wiecki; P Pechtel; C Webb; F Goer; L Murray; M Trivedi; M Fava; P J McGrath; M Weissman; R Parsey; B Kurian; P Adams; T Carmody; S Weyandt; K Shores-Wilson; M Toups; M McInnis; M A Oquendo; C Cusin; P Deldin; G Bruder; D A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  Some task demands induce collapsing bounds: Evidence from a behavioral analysis.

Authors:  James J Palestro; Emily Weichart; Per B Sederberg; Brandon M Turner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Approaches to Analysis in Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Birte U Forstmann; Bradley C Love; Thomas J Palmeri; Leendert Van Maanen
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.

Authors:  Corey N White; Mathieu Servant; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

6.  Hierarchical approximate Bayesian computation.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Trisha Van Zandt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  On the Neural and Mechanistic Bases of Self-Control.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Christian A Rodriguez; Qingfang Liu; M Fiona Molloy; Marjolein Hoogendijk; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Likelihood approximation networks (LANs) for fast inference of simulation models in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Alexander Fengler; Lakshmi N Govindarajan; Tony Chen; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  A new model of decision processing in instrumental learning tasks.

Authors:  Steven Miletić; Russell J Boag; Anne C Trutti; Niek Stevenson; Birte U Forstmann; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.