Literature DB >> 15826231

Practice increases the efficiency of evidence accumulation in perceptual choice.

Scott Brown1, Andrew Heathcote.   

Abstract

Most models of choice response time base decisions on evidence accumulated over time. A fundamental distinction among these models concerns whether each piece of evidence is equally weighted (lossless accumulation) or unequally weighted (leaky accumulation). The authors tested a hypothesis derived from A. Heathcote and S. Brown's (2002) self-exciting expert competitor (SEEXC) model of skill acquisition: that evidence accumulation becomes less leaky with practice. The hypothesis was supported by observation that the effects of prime stimuli increased with practice. The authors used metacontrast masked primes, which could not be consciously discriminated by most participants, to avoid methodological problems associated with conscious strategy changes. The form of the law of practice in the data is also shown to be consistent with the SEEXC model. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15826231     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accounting for speed-accuracy tradeoff in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Charles C Liu; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making.

Authors:  Guy E Hawkins; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Roger Ratcliff; Scott D Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  How mechanisms of perceptual decision-making affect the psychometric function.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Long Ding
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Differentiating between integration and non-integration strategies in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Gabriel M Stine; Ariel Zylberberg; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The effects of evidence bounds on decision-making: theoretical and empirical developments.

Authors:  Jiaxiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01

7.  Linear deterministic accumulator models of simple choice.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Jonathon Love
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-23

8.  Using Time-Varying Evidence to Test Models of Decision Dynamics: Bounded Diffusion vs. the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsetsos; Juan Gao; James L McClelland; Marius Usher
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.