Alexander Weigard1, Cynthia Huang-Pollock2, Andrew Heathcote2, Larry Hawk3, Nicolas J Schlienz4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Rachel Upjohn Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. asw5097@psu.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, Penn State University, University Park, Hobart, PA, 16801, USA. 3. The State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, USA. 4. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Cigarette smokers often experience cognitive decrements during abstinence from tobacco, and these decrements may have clinical relevance in the context of smoking cessation interventions. However, limitations of the behavioral summary statistics used to measure cognitive effects of abstinence, response times (RT) and accuracy rates, may restrict the field's ability to identify robust abstinence effects on task performance and test mechanistic hypotheses about the etiology of these cognitive changes. OBJECTIVES: The current study explored whether a measurement approach based on mathematical models of cognition, which make the cognitive mechanisms necessary to perform choice RT tasks explicit, would be able to address these limitations. METHODS: The linear ballistic accumulator model (LBA: Brown and Heathcote, Cogn Psychol 57(3):153-178, 2008) was fit to an existing data set from a study that evaluated the impact of overnight abstinence on flanker task performance. RESULTS: The model-based analysis provided evidence that smokers' rates of mind wandering increased during abstinence, and was able to index this effect while controlling for participants' strategy changes that were related to the specific experimental paradigm used. CONCLUSION: Mind wandering is a putative explanation for cognitive withdrawal symptoms during smoking cessation and may be indexed using the LBA. More broadly, the use of formal model-based analyses in future research on this topic has the potential to allow for strong and specific tests of mechanistic explanations for these symptoms.
RATIONALE: Cigarette smokers often experience cognitive decrements during abstinence from tobacco, and these decrements may have clinical relevance in the context of smoking cessation interventions. However, limitations of the behavioral summary statistics used to measure cognitive effects of abstinence, response times (RT) and accuracy rates, may restrict the field's ability to identify robust abstinence effects on task performance and test mechanistic hypotheses about the etiology of these cognitive changes. OBJECTIVES: The current study explored whether a measurement approach based on mathematical models of cognition, which make the cognitive mechanisms necessary to perform choice RT tasks explicit, would be able to address these limitations. METHODS: The linear ballistic accumulator model (LBA: Brown and Heathcote, Cogn Psychol 57(3):153-178, 2008) was fit to an existing data set from a study that evaluated the impact of overnight abstinence on flanker task performance. RESULTS: The model-based analysis provided evidence that smokers' rates of mind wandering increased during abstinence, and was able to index this effect while controlling for participants' strategy changes that were related to the specific experimental paradigm used. CONCLUSION: Mind wandering is a putative explanation for cognitive withdrawal symptoms during smoking cessation and may be indexed using the LBA. More broadly, the use of formal model-based analyses in future research on this topic has the potential to allow for strong and specific tests of mechanistic explanations for these symptoms.
Authors: Babette Rae; Andrew Heathcote; Chris Donkin; Lee Averell; Scott Brown Journal: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: John R Fedota; Thomas J Ross; Juan Castillo; Michael R McKenna; Allison L Matous; Betty Jo Salmeron; Vinod Menon; Elliot A Stein Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Harshawardhan U Deshpande; John R Fedota; Juan Castillo; Betty Jo Salmeron; Thomas J Ross; Elliot A Stein Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 8.294