Literature DB >> 32483344

Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions.

Silvia U Maier1,2,3, Anjali Raja Beharelle4,5, Rafael Polanía6,7, Christian C Ruff8,6, Todd A Hare9,10.   

Abstract

Theories and computational models of decision-making usually focus on how strongly different attributes are weighted in choice, for example, as a function of their importance or salience to the decision-maker. However, when different attributes affect the decision process is a question that has received far less attention. Here, we investigated whether the timing of attribute consideration has a unique influence on decision-making by using a time-varying drift diffusion model and data from four separate experiments. Experimental manipulations of attention and neural activity demonstrated that we can dissociate the processes that determine the relative weighting strength and timing of attribute consideration. Thus, the processes determining either the weighting strengths or the timing of attributes in decision-making can independently adapt to changes in the environment or goals. Quantifying these separate influences of timing and weighting on choice improves our understanding and predictions of individual differences in decision behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483344     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0893-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  54 in total

1.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Evidence against perfect integration of sensory information during perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Matthew A Carland; Encarni Marcos; David Thura; Paul Cisek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The Importance of Falsification in Computational Cognitive Modeling.

Authors:  Stefano Palminteri; Valentin Wyart; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Jared M Hotaling; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.

Authors:  B U Forstmann; R Ratcliff; E-J Wagenmakers
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed.

Authors:  Nicolette Sullivan; Cendri Hutcherson; Alison Harris; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-16

7.  Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The influence of attention on value integration.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Derrick G Watson; Konstantinos Tsetsos; Nick Chater
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Hierarchical competitions subserving multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Laurence T Hunt; Raymond J Dolan; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Search predicts and changes patience in intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Crystal Reeck; Daniel Wall; Eric J Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  How peer influence shapes value computation in moral decision-making.

Authors:  Hongbo Yu; Jenifer Z Siegel; John A Clithero; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 2.  Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making.

Authors:  R Frömer; A Shenhav
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Dennison; Daniel Sazhin; David V Smith
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Neural Representations of Food-Related Attributes in the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex during Choice Deliberation in Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Alice M Xue; Karin Foerde; B Timothy Walsh; Joanna E Steinglass; Daphna Shohamy; Akram Bakkour
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.

Authors:  Gustav Markkula; Zeynep Uludağ; Richard McGilchrist Wilkie; Jac Billington
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Defensive freezing and its relation to approach-avoidance decision-making under threat.

Authors:  Felix H Klaassen; Leslie Held; Bernd Figner; Jill X O'Reilly; Floris Klumpers; Lycia D de Voogd; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Changes in brain and behavior during food-based decision-making following treatment of anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Karin Foerde; B Timothy Walsh; Maya Dalack; Nathaniel Daw; Daphna Shohamy; Joanna E Steinglass
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-04-17

8.  Sources of confidence in value-based choice.

Authors:  Jeroen Brus; Helena Aebersold; Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Older adults process the probability of winning sooner but weigh it less during lottery decisions.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Todd A Hare; Hsiang-Yu Chen; Gaia Lombardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Healthy decisions in the cued-attribute food choice paradigm have high test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Zahra Barakchian; Anjali Raja Beharelle; Todd A Hare
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.