Literature DB >> 31326724

Optimal models of decision-making in dynamic environments.

Zachary P Kilpatrick1, William R Holmes2, Tahra L Eissa3, Krešimir Josić4.   

Abstract

Nature is in constant flux, so animals must account for changes in their environment when making decisions. How animals learn the timescale of such changes and adapt their decision strategies accordingly is not well understood. Recent psychophysical experiments have shown humans and other animals can achieve near-optimal performance at two alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks in dynamically changing environments. Characterization of performance requires the derivation and analysis of computational models of optimal decision-making policies on such tasks. We review recent theoretical work in this area, and discuss how models compare with subjects' behavior in tasks where the correct choice or evidence quality changes in dynamic, but predictable, ways.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31326724      PMCID: PMC6859206          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  49 in total

1.  Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior?

Authors:  Angela J Yu; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2008

2.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

3.  Discriminating evidence accumulation from urgency signals in speeded decision making.

Authors:  Guy E Hawkins; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Roger Ratcliff; Scott D Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment.

Authors:  Ori Ossmy; Rani Moran; Thomas Pfeffer; Konstantinos Tsetsos; Marius Usher; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Bayesian online learning of the hazard rate in change-point problems.

Authors:  Robert C Wilson; Matthew R Nassar; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability.

Authors:  Sophie Deneve
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Overcoming indecision by changing the decision boundary.

Authors:  Gaurav Malhotra; David S Leslie; Casimir J H Ludwig; Rafal Bogacz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04-13

9.  Pupil-linked arousal is driven by decision uncertainty and alters serial choice bias.

Authors:  Anne E Urai; Anke Braun; Tobias H Donner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Rats adopt the optimal timescale for evidence integration in a dynamic environment.

Authors:  Alex T Piet; Ahmed El Hady; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stable choice coding in rat frontal orienting fields across model-predicted changes of mind.

Authors:  J Tyler Boyd-Meredith; Alex T Piet; Emily Jane Dennis; Ahmed El Hady; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.