Literature DB >> 26759845

Missed connections: Unintended consequences of updated cervical cancer screening guidelines on screening rates for sexually transmitted infections.

Tali Bogler, Allison Farber, Nathan Stall, Sheila Wijayasinghe, Morgan Slater, Charlie Guiang, Richard H Glazier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of the updated 2012 cervical cancer screening guidelines on the rates of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening in primary care.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Five academic family practice units at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Female patients, aged 19 to 25, who had at least 1 visit with a physician at 1 of the 5 academic family practice units during a 12-month period before (May 1, 2011, to April 30, 2012) or after (November 1, 2012, to October 31, 2013) the release of the updated guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of women who received Papanicolaou tests or underwent STI screening; rates of STI screening performed during a Pap test or a periodic health examination; screening rates for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis C; and the methods used for STI screening before and after the release of the updated guidelines. Results Before the release of the 2012 guidelines, 42 of 100 women had Pap tests and 40 of 100 women underwent STI screening. After the release of the guidelines, 17 of 100 women had Pap tests and 20 of 100 women received STI screening. Female patients were less likely to undergo STI screening under the 2012 guidelines compared with the 2005 guidelines (odds ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.74; P = .003).
CONCLUSION: Implementation of the 2012 cervical cancer screening guidelines was associated with lower rates of STI screening in the primary care setting. Primary care physicians should screen at-risk women for STIs at any clinically appropriate encounter and consider using noninvasive self-sampling methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26759845      PMCID: PMC4607350     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  13 in total

1.  Sex condoms and STDs among young people.

Authors:  Michelle Rotermann
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.796

2.  Cervical screening: a guideline for clinical practice in Ontario.

Authors:  Joan Murphy; Erin B Kennedy; Sheila Dunn; C Meg McLachlin; Michael Fung Kee Fung; Danusia Gzik; Michael Shier; Lawrence Paszat
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-05

3.  Sexual behaviour and condom use of 15- to 24-year-olds in 2003 and 2009/2010.

Authors:  Michelle Rotermann
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.796

4.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The intended and unintended consequences of clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca J Shackelton; Lisa D Marceau; Carol L Link; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Cynthia M Boyd; Jonathan Darer; Chad Boult; Linda P Fried; Lisa Boult; Albert W Wu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Unintended consequences of delisting routine eye exams on retinopathy screening for people with diabetes in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Tara Kiran; Alexander Kopp; Rahim Moineddin; J Charles Victor; Robert J Campbell; Baiju R Shah; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky; Edward W Hook; David H Martin; Jeannine Lane; Randy Johnson; Jeanne A Jordan; Deanna Fuller; Dean E Willis; Paul M Fine; William M Janda; Julius Schachter
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study.

Authors:  David N Juurlink; Muhammad M Mamdani; Douglas S Lee; Alexander Kopp; Peter C Austin; Andreas Laupacis; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Darlene Taylor; Carole Lunny; Tom Wong; Mark Gilbert; Neville Li; Richard Lester; Mel Krajden; Linda Hoang; Gina Ogilvie
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Recommendations for the routine screening pelvic examination: Could they have a negative effect on physician competence?

Authors:  Roger Ladouceur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The Effect of Changes in Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines on Chlamydia Testing.

Authors:  Michelle S Naimer; Jeffrey C Kwong; Deepit Bhatia; Rahim Moineddin; Michael Whelan; Michael A Campitelli; Liane Macdonald; Aisha Lofters; Ashleigh Tuite; Tali Bogler; Joanne A Permaul; Warren J McIsaac
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.166

3. 

Authors:  Elliot Lass; Lucshman Raveendran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Educational implications of changing the guidelines for the digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Elliot Lass; Lucshman Raveendran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing and Case Rates Among Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Shimrit Keddem; Marissa Maier; Carolyn Gardella; Joleen Borgerding; Elliott Lowy; Maggie Chartier; Sally Haskell; Ronald G Hauser; Lauren A Beste
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  Methylation analysis and HPV genotyping of self-collected cervical samples from women not responding to screening invitation and review of the literature.

Authors:  Annarosa Del Mistro; Helena Frayle; Martina Rizzi; Gianpiero Fantin; Antonio Ferro; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Emma Altobelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Amy Mark; Monica Taljaard; Michael E Green; Richard H Glazier; Simone Dahrouge
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Screening for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in primary health care: systematic reviews on effectiveness and patient preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer Pillay; Aireen Wingert; Tara MacGregor; Michelle Gates; Ben Vandermeer; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.