OBJECTIVES: First, we examine whether clinical guidelines, designed to improve health care and reduce disparities in clinical practice, are achieving their intended consequences. Second, we contemplate potential unintended consequences of clinical guidelines. METHOD: As part of a factorial experiment we presented primary care doctors (n = 192) with clinically authentic vignettes of a 'patient' with already diagnosed diabetes with an emerging foot neuropathy. Their proposed clinical actions were compared with established practice guidelines for this clinical situation. RESULTS: After establishing the existence of consistent socioeconomic disparities in the proposed management of the case presented, we found that reported use of practice guidelines had no measurable effect towards their reduction (one intended consequence). However, the reported use of practice guidelines appeared to precipitate more clinical actions, without eliminating documented disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other research we find that clinical practice guidelines are not producing a principal intended result, and may even produce unintended consequences.
OBJECTIVES: First, we examine whether clinical guidelines, designed to improve health care and reduce disparities in clinical practice, are achieving their intended consequences. Second, we contemplate potential unintended consequences of clinical guidelines. METHOD: As part of a factorial experiment we presented primary care doctors (n = 192) with clinically authentic vignettes of a 'patient' with already diagnosed diabetes with an emerging foot neuropathy. Their proposed clinical actions were compared with established practice guidelines for this clinical situation. RESULTS: After establishing the existence of consistent socioeconomic disparities in the proposed management of the case presented, we found that reported use of practice guidelines had no measurable effect towards their reduction (one intended consequence). However, the reported use of practice guidelines appeared to precipitate more clinical actions, without eliminating documented disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with other research we find that clinical practice guidelines are not producing a principal intended result, and may even produce unintended consequences.
Authors: John McKinlay; Carol Link; Lisa Marceau; Amy O'Donnell; Sara Arber; Ann Adams; Karen Lutfey Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-02-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tali Bogler; Allison Farber; Nathan Stall; Sheila Wijayasinghe; Morgan Slater; Charlie Guiang; Richard H Glazier Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Adam Wright; Thu-Trang T Hickman; Dustin McEvoy; Skye Aaron; Angela Ai; Jan Marie Andersen; Salman Hussain; Rachel Ramoni; Julie Fiskio; Dean F Sittig; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 4.497