Literature DB >> 23296581

Unintended consequences of delisting routine eye exams on retinopathy screening for people with diabetes in Ontario, Canada.

Tara Kiran1, Alexander Kopp, Rahim Moineddin, J Charles Victor, Robert J Campbell, Baiju R Shah, Richard H Glazier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine eye examinations for healthy adults aged 20-64 years were delisted from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan in 2004, but they continue to be insured for people with diabetes regardless of age. We sought to assess whether the delisting of routine eye examinations for healthy adults had the unintended consequence of decreasing retinopathy screening for adults with diabetes.
METHODS: We used administrative data to calculate eye examinations for people with diabetes ages 40-64 years and 65 years and older in each 2-year period from 1998 to 2010. We examined differences by sex, income, rurality and type of health care provider. We used segmented linear regression to assess the change in trend before and after 2004.
RESULTS: For people with diabetes aged 65 years and older, eye examinations rose gradually from 1998 to 2010, with no substantial change between 2004 and 2006. For people with diabetes aged 40-65 years, there was an 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3%-11.1%) decrease in eye examinations between 2004 and 2006. Results were similar for all population subgroups. Ophthalmologic examinations decreased steadily for both age groups during the study period, and there was a decline in optometry examinations for people ages 40-65 years after 2004.
INTERPRETATION: The delisting of routine eye examinations for healthy adults in Ontario had the unintended consequence of reducing publicly funded retinopathy screening for people with diabetes. More research is needed to understand whether patients are being charged for an insured service or to what degree misunderstanding has prevented patients from seeking care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296581      PMCID: PMC3576462          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  13 in total

1.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research.

Authors:  A K Wagner; S B Soumerai; F Zhang; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance.

Authors:  Howard Brody
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Universal health insurance and equity in primary care and specialist office visits: a population-based study.

Authors:  Richard H Glazier; Mohammad M Agha; Rahim Moineddin; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  How effective are treatments for diabetic retinopathy?

Authors:  F L Ferris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Ning Cheung; Paul Mitchell; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  De-insurance in Ontario has reduced use of eye care services by the socially disadvantaged.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Jin; Yvonne M Buys; Wendy Hatch; Graham E Trope
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm.

Authors:  Janet E Hux; Frank Ivis; Virginia Flintoft; Adina Bica
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Management of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Quresh Mohamed; Mark C Gillies; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States.

Authors:  John H Kempen; Benita J O'Colmain; M Cristina Leske; Steven M Haffner; Ronald Klein; Scot E Moss; Hugh R Taylor; Richard F Hamman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

10.  Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  8 in total

1.  Income-related inequalities in visual impairment and eye screening services in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jongnam Hwang; Christopher Rudnisky; Sarah Bowen; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Missed connections: Unintended consequences of updated cervical cancer screening guidelines on screening rates for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Tali Bogler; Allison Farber; Nathan Stall; Sheila Wijayasinghe; Morgan Slater; Charlie Guiang; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Delisted routine eye examinations for nonrefractive eye conditions: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  William Jeon; Graham E Trope; Richard H Glazier; Michael H Brent; Yvonne M Buys; Ya-Ping Jin
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-07-15

4.  Opportunities To Improve Diabetes Care in the Hemodialysis Unit: A Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Kristin K Clemens; Alexandra M Ouédraogo; Amit X Garg; Samuel A Silver; Danielle M Nash
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-02-19

5.  Using self-reported data on the social determinants of health in primary care to identify cancer screening disparities: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  A K Lofters; A Schuler; M Slater; N N Baxter; N Persaud; A D Pinto; E Kucharski; S Davie; R Nisenbaum; T Kiran
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Patient Perspectives on Removing Adult Tonsillectomy and Septoplasty from the Government Health Insurance Plan in a Publicly Funded Health Care System.

Authors:  Elysia Grose; Sarah Chiodo; Marc Levin; Antoine Eskander; Vincent Lin; Brad Hubbard; Albino Chiodo
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  A randomised trial of non-mydriatic ultra-wide field retinal imaging versus usual care to screen for diabetic eye disease: rationale and protocol for the Clearsight trial.

Authors:  Selina L Liu; Lewis W Mahon; Neil S Klar; David C Schulz; John R Gonder; Irene M Hramiak; Jeffrey L Mahon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting.

Authors:  Claire Harris; Sally Green; Wayne Ramsey; Kelly Allen; Richard King
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.