Literature DB >> 27302994

Recommendations for the routine screening pelvic examination: Could they have a negative effect on physician competence?

Roger Ladouceur.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27302994      PMCID： PMC4907545     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN： 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Andrae Vandross; Caitlin Toomey; Michael Cheung; Jason Rho; Steven Quinn; Satish Jacob Chacko; Durga Borkar; Victor Gall; Senthil Selvaraj; Nancy Ho; Adam Cifu
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study.

Authors:  Adam G Elshaug; Amber M Watt; Linda Mundy; Cameron D Willis
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Missed connections: Unintended consequences of updated cervical cancer screening guidelines on screening rates for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Tali Bogler; Allison Farber; Nathan Stall; Sheila Wijayasinghe; Morgan Slater; Charlie Guiang; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care adoption of the American College of Physicians guideline.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Ainsley Moore; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Screening pelvic examination in adult women: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Linda L Humphrey; Russell Harris; Melissa Starkey; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Routine screening pelvic examinations have a negative effect on patients.

Authors:  Robert W Shepherd
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Concern is not based on evidence.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.