Literature DB >> 31722918

Educational implications of changing the guidelines for the digital rectal examination.

Elliot Lass1, Lucshman Raveendran2.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID: 31722918      PMCID: PMC6853337     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

1.  Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Kevin T McVary; Claus G Roehrborn; Andrew L Avins; Michael J Barry; Reginald C Bruskewitz; Robert F Donnell; Harris E Foster; Chris M Gonzalez; Steven A Kaplan; David F Penson; James C Ulchaker; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Choosing Wisely for Medical Education: Six Things Medical Students and Trainees Should Question.

Authors:  Anand Lakhani; Elliot Lass; William K Silverstein; Karen B Born; Wendy Levinson; Brian M Wong
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects.

Authors:  Suneetha Rachaneni; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Construct validity in a high-fidelity prostate exam simulator.

Authors:  C G Kowalik; G J Gerling; A J Lee; W C Carson; J Harper; C A Moskaluk; T L Krupski
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Leen Naji; Harkanwal Randhawa; Zahra Sohani; Brittany Dennis; Deanna Lautenbach; Owen Kavanagh; Monica Bawor; Laura Banfield; Jason Profetto
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Creation of a Novel Digital Rectal Examination Evaluation Instrument to Teach and Assess Prostate Examination Proficiency.

Authors:  Matthew B Clements; Karen M Schmidt; Steven E Canfield; Scott M Gilbert; Shiv R Khandelwal; Bridget F Koontz; Costas D Lallas; Stanley Liauw; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Edouard J Trabulsi; Helen P Cathro; Noah S Schenkman; Tracey L Krupski
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia.

Authors:  Kasaya Tantiphlachiva; Priyanka Rao; Ashok Attaluri; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Patient's reactions to digital rectal examination of the prostate.

Authors:  Andre B Furlan; Rafael Kato; Fabio Vicentini; Jose Cury; Alberto A Antunes; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Traumatic urethral injuries: does the digital rectal examination really help us?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; S Mohammed Jafri; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ravi R Rajani; Grace S Rozycki; David V Feliciano; Amy D Wyrzykowski
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  IS DIGITAL RECTAL EXAM RELIABLE IN GRADING ANAL SPHINCTER DEFECTS?

Authors:  Marcelo de Melo Andrade Coura; Silvana Marques Silva; Romulo Medeiros de Almeida; Miles Castedo Forrest; João Batista Sousa
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.