Literature DB >> 26755897

Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.

Taylor Pressler Vydra1, Edward Cuaresma2, Matthew Kretovics3, Seuli Bose-Brill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personal health records (PHRs) enable patients to access their healthcare information in a secure environment, increasing patient engagement in medical care. PHRs can be tethered to a patient's electronic health record (EHR). Tethered PHRs, also known as patient portals, allow patients to access relevant medical information from their provider. Despite recent policy efforts to promote the use of health information technology and increased availability of PHRs in the clinical setting, PHR adoption rates remain relatively low overall. This article examines physician characteristics of high vs. low PHR adopters.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (1) examine PHR use patterns in the primary care setting, (2) identify physician characteristics affecting PHR adoption, and (3) explore physician perspectives encouraging and deterring use.
METHODS: Information technology records provided data on primary care patient portal use at a large Midwestern academic medical center. Electronic surveys were administered to affiliated primary care physicians to measure their perceived use of patient portals. A focus group consisting of physician providers who completed the survey was used to further elucidate the trends and perceived utilization of the patient portal in the clinical setting.
RESULTS: While they expended significant time communicating with patients using the portal, physicians generally overestimated the time spent per week on the system. Physicians who had been in practice longer estimated a higher average time spent on the system when compared to newer physicians. Patient portal activation rates and use decreased with increased years in practice. During the focus groups, physicians voiced motivation to use patient portals because they perceived improved patient communication and satisfaction with use. However, continued lack of reimbursement for time spent in portal communication was reported as a major barrier to providers' engagement with this technology. DISCUSSION: Physician endorsement and engagement is critical to achieve widespread adoption of PHRs. Such endorsement can be obtained through (1) providing rewards from health system employers for high use of PHRs, (2) providing financial reimbursement for time spent electronically communicating with patients via the PHR from federal initiatives incentivizing meaningful use of health information technology, (3) building robust support staff assistance for PHR communication into primary care workflows, and (4) integrating more PHR-specific education into providers' EHR training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; patient portals; personal health records; primary care; provider reimbursement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26755897      PMCID: PMC4696089     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag        ISSN: 1559-4122


  31 in total

1.  First steps in qualitative data analysis: transcribing.

Authors:  Julia Bailey
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Personal health records: meaningful use, but for whom?

Authors:  Joseph Kannry; Pratharna Beuria; Emily Wang; Julie Nissim
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

3.  Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.

Authors:  Vaishali Patel; Eric Jamoom; Chun-Ju Hsiao; Michael F Furukawa; Melinda Buntin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Personal health records: a scoping review.

Authors:  N Archer; U Fevrier-Thomas; C Lokker; K A McKibbon; S E Straus
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record.

Authors:  Cyrus K Yamin; Srinivas Emani; Deborah H Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-28

6.  Family physicians' perspectives on personal health records: qualitative study.

Authors:  Gary L Yau; Andrew S Williams; Judith Belle Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design.

Authors:  Elissa R Weitzman; Liljana Kaci; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.

Authors:  Kim M Nazi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Personal health records in the preclinical medical curriculum: modeling student responses in a simple educational environment utilizing Google Health.

Authors:  Dimokratis A Karamanlis; Panagiotis M Tzitzis; Charalampos A Bratsas; Panagiotis D Bamidis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  24 in total

1.  Effect of Electronic Messaging on Glucose Control and Hospital Admissions Among Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Brian Petullo; Byron Noble; Kathleen M Dungan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Developing mobile self-tracking for chronic disease prevention: Why listening to users matters?

Authors:  Vasileios Nittas
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Transformation of the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Big Data, Accountable Care, and Predictive Health Analytics.

Authors:  Seuli Bose Brill; Karen O Moss; Laura Prater
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-12

4.  Combining Ontologies and Open Standards to Derive a Middle Layer Information Model for Interoperability of Personal and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Panagiotis Plastiras; Dympna M O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Potential of personal health record portals in the care of individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders: Provider perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer N Hill; Bridget M Smith; Frances M Weaver; Kim M Nazi; Florian P Thomas; Barry Goldstein; Timothy P Hogan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Factors Associated with Reducing Disparities in Electronic Personal Heath Records Use Among Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic Adults.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Sydney E Manning; Amy F Ho; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-04-27

7.  A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION OF STANDALONE PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD USE BY PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.

Authors:  Kevin T Fuji; Amy A Abbott; Kimberly A Galt
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  Functions and Outcomes of Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Somayeh Paydar; Hassan Emami; Farkhondeh Asadi; Hamid Moghaddasi; Azamossadat Hosseini
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2021-03-15

9.  Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Amanda C Blok; Daniel J Amante; Timothy P Hogan; Rajani S Sadasivam; Stephanie L Shimada; Susan Woods; Kim M Nazi; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The Rules of Engagement: Perspectives on Secure Messaging From Experienced Ambulatory Patient Portal Users.

Authors:  Cynthia J Sieck; Jennifer L Hefner; Jeanette Schnierle; Hannah Florian; Aradhna Agarwal; Kristen Rundell; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.