Amanda C Blok1,2, Daniel J Amante3, Timothy P Hogan4,5, Rajani S Sadasivam3, Stephanie L Shimada3,4,6, Susan Woods7, Kim M Nazi8, Thomas K Houston9. 1. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Amanda.Blok@va.gov. 2. Systems, Populations and Leadership Department, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Amanda.Blok@va.gov. 3. Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 4. Veterans Affairs Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA. 5. Department of Population and Data Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 6. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Maine Behavioral Healthcare, South Portland, ME, USA. 8. KMN Consulting Services, Coxsackie, NY, USA. 9. Learning Health Systems, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an effort to foster patient engagement, some healthcare systems provide their patients with open notes, enabling them to access their clinical notes online. In January 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented online access to clinical notes ("VA Notes") through the Blue Button feature of its patient portal. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association of online patient access to clinical notes with changes in healthcare utilization and clinician documentation behaviors. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients accessing My HealtheVet (MHV), the VA's online patient portal, between July 2011 and January 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Use of healthcare services (primary care clinic visits and online electronic secure messaging), and characteristics of physician clinical documentation (readability of notes). KEY RESULTS: Among 882,575 unique portal users, those who accessed clinical notes (16.2%; N = 122,972) were younger, more racially homogenous (white), and less likely to be financially vulnerable. Compared with non-users, Notes users more frequently used the secure messaging feature on the portal (mean of 2.6 messages (SD 7.0) v. 0.87 messages (SD 3.3) in January-July 2013), but their higher use of secure messaging began prior to VA Notes implementation, and thus was not temporally related to the implementation. When comparing clinic visit rates pre- and post-implementation, Notes users had a small but significant increase in rate of 0.36 primary care clinic visits (2012 v. 2013) compared to portal users who did not view their Notes (p = 0.01). At baseline, the mean reading ease of primary care clinical notes was 53.8 (SD 10.1) and did not improve after implementation of VA Notes. CONCLUSIONS: VA Notes users were different than patients with portal access who did not view their notes online, and they had higher rates of healthcare service use prior to and after VA Notes implementation. Opportunities exist to improve clinical note access and readability.
BACKGROUND: In an effort to foster patient engagement, some healthcare systems provide their patients with open notes, enabling them to access their clinical notes online. In January 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented online access to clinical notes ("VA Notes") through the Blue Button feature of its patient portal. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association of online patient access to clinical notes with changes in healthcare utilization and clinician documentation behaviors. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients accessing My HealtheVet (MHV), the VA's online patient portal, between July 2011 and January 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Use of healthcare services (primary care clinic visits and online electronic secure messaging), and characteristics of physician clinical documentation (readability of notes). KEY RESULTS: Among 882,575 unique portal users, those who accessed clinical notes (16.2%; N = 122,972) were younger, more racially homogenous (white), and less likely to be financially vulnerable. Compared with non-users, Notes users more frequently used the secure messaging feature on the portal (mean of 2.6 messages (SD 7.0) v. 0.87 messages (SD 3.3) in January-July 2013), but their higher use of secure messaging began prior to VA Notes implementation, and thus was not temporally related to the implementation. When comparing clinic visit rates pre- and post-implementation, Notes users had a small but significant increase in rate of 0.36 primary care clinic visits (2012 v. 2013) compared to portal users who did not view their Notes (p = 0.01). At baseline, the mean reading ease of primary care clinical notes was 53.8 (SD 10.1) and did not improve after implementation of VA Notes. CONCLUSIONS: VA Notes users were different than patients with portal access who did not view their notes online, and they had higher rates of healthcare service use prior to and after VA Notes implementation. Opportunities exist to improve clinical note access and readability.
Authors: Steven K Dobscha; Emily A Kenyon; Maura K Pisciotta; Meike Niederhausen; Susan Woods; Lauren M Denneson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Jessica S Ancker; Yolanda Barrón; Maxine L Rockoff; Diane Hauser; Michelle Pichardo; Adam Szerencsy; Neil Calman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sara L Jackson; Roanne Mejilla; Jonathan D Darer; Natalia V Oster; James D Ralston; Suzanne G Leveille; Jan Walker; Tom Delbanco; Joann G Elmore Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jinying Chen; Emily Druhl; Balaji Polepalli Ramesh; Thomas K Houston; Cynthia A Brandt; Donna M Zulman; Varsha G Vimalananda; Samir Malkani; Hong Yu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stephanie Leah Shimada; Cynthia A Brandt; Hua Feng; D Keith McInnes; Sowmya R Rao; James A Rothendler; David A Haggstrom; Erica A Abel; Lisa S Cioffari; Thomas K Houston Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 5.428