BACKGROUND: Federal initiatives are underway that provide physicians with financial incentives for meaningful use (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) and assistance to purchase and implement EHRs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine readiness and interest in MU among primary care physicians and specialists, and identify factors that may affect their readiness to obtain MU incentives. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 4 years of data (2008-2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Supplement, an annual cross-sectional nationally representative survey of non-federally employed office-based physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Survey-weighted EHR adoption rates, potential to meet selected MU criteria, and self-reported intention to apply for MU incentives. We also examined the association between physician and practice characteristics and readiness for MU. KEY RESULTS: The overall sample consisted of 10,889 respondents, with weighted response rates of 62 % (2008); 74 % (2009); 66 % (2010); and 61 % (2011). Primary care physicians' adoption of EHRs with the potential to meet MU nearly doubled from 2009 to 2011 (18 % to 38 %, p<0.01), and was significantly higher than specialists (19 %) in 2011 (p<0.01). In 2011, half of physicians (52 %) expressed their intention to apply for MU incentives; this did not vary by specialty. Multivariate analyses report that EHR adoption was significantly higher in both 2010 and 2011 compared to 2009, and primary care physicians and physicians working in larger or multi-specialty practices or for HMOs were more likely to adopt EHRs with the potential to meet MU. CONCLUSIONS: Physician EHR adoption rates increased in advance of MU incentive payments. Although interest in MU incentives did not vary by specialty, primary care physicians had significantly higher rates of adopting EHRs with the potential to meet MU. Addressing barriers to EHR adoption, which may vary by specialty, will be important to enhancing coordination of care.
BACKGROUND: Federal initiatives are underway that provide physicians with financial incentives for meaningful use (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) and assistance to purchase and implement EHRs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine readiness and interest in MU among primary care physicians and specialists, and identify factors that may affect their readiness to obtain MU incentives. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 4 years of data (2008-2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Supplement, an annual cross-sectional nationally representative survey of non-federally employed office-based physicians. MAIN MEASURES: Survey-weighted EHR adoption rates, potential to meet selected MU criteria, and self-reported intention to apply for MU incentives. We also examined the association between physician and practice characteristics and readiness for MU. KEY RESULTS: The overall sample consisted of 10,889 respondents, with weighted response rates of 62 % (2008); 74 % (2009); 66 % (2010); and 61 % (2011). Primary care physicians' adoption of EHRs with the potential to meet MU nearly doubled from 2009 to 2011 (18 % to 38 %, p<0.01), and was significantly higher than specialists (19 %) in 2011 (p<0.01). In 2011, half of physicians (52 %) expressed their intention to apply for MU incentives; this did not vary by specialty. Multivariate analyses report that EHR adoption was significantly higher in both 2010 and 2011 compared to 2009, and primary care physicians and physicians working in larger or multi-specialty practices or for HMOs were more likely to adopt EHRs with the potential to meet MU. CONCLUSIONS: Physician EHR adoption rates increased in advance of MU incentive payments. Although interest in MU incentives did not vary by specialty, primary care physicians had significantly higher rates of adopting EHRs with the potential to meet MU. Addressing barriers to EHR adoption, which may vary by specialty, will be important to enhancing coordination of care.
Authors: Steven R Simon; Rainu Kaushal; Paul D Cleary; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; E John Orav; Elisabeth Burdick; Eric G Poon; David W Bates Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-12
Authors: Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Matthew F Burke; Michael C Hoaglin; David Blumenthal Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Louis M Bell; Robert Grundmeier; Russell Localio; Joseph Zorc; Alexander G Fiks; Xuemei Zhang; Tyra Bryant Stephens; Marguerite Swietlik; James P Guevara Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: James D Bramble; Kim A Galt; Mark V Siracuse; Amy A Abbott; Andjela Drincic; Karen A Paschal; Kevin T Fuji Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2010 Jan-Mar
Authors: Stewart Babbott; Linda Baier Manwell; Roger Brown; Enid Montague; Eric Williams; Mark Schwartz; Erik Hess; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: José Carlos Ferrão; Mónica Duarte Oliveira; Filipe Janela; Henrique M G Martins; Daniel Gartner Journal: Health Syst (Basingstoke) Date: 2020-03-01
Authors: Shikha Chaganti; Jamie R Robinson; Camilo Bermudez; Thomas Lasko; Louise A Mawn; Bennett A Landman Journal: Deep Learn Med Image Anal Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support (2017) Date: 2017-09-09
Authors: Brock Polnaszek; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Melissa Hovanes; Rachel Roiland; Patrick Ferguson; Roger Brown; Amy J H Kind Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 2.983