Literature DB >> 22976365

Personal health records: meaningful use, but for whom?

Joseph Kannry1, Pratharna Beuria, Emily Wang, Julie Nissim.   

Abstract

Providers and hospitals have received more than $5 billion from the federal government for meaningfully using electronic health records as of April 2012. Meaningful Use stage 1 makes adoption of the personal health record optional. The proposed Meaningful Use stage 2 regulations make personal health record use mandatory. There is peer-reviewed literature to support a personal health record adoption rate of 10%, which is optional in stage 1 and required in stage 2. The literature also supports the use of secure messaging required in stage 2. However, there is little evidence to support other stage 2 personal health record requirements and dependencies. Further study is urgently needed to ensure that Meaningful Use stage 2 is meaningful for both patients and providers.
© 2012 Mount Sinai School of Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22976365     DOI: 10.1002/msj.21334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med        ISSN: 0027-2507


  11 in total

1.  Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.

Authors:  Taylor Pressler Vydra; Edward Cuaresma; Matthew Kretovics; Seuli Bose-Brill
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Patient access to clinical notes in oncology: A mixed method analysis of oncologists' attitudes and linguistic characteristics towards notes.

Authors:  Jordan M Alpert; Bonny B Morris; Maria D Thomson; Khalid Matin; Roy T Sabo; Richard F Brown
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-05-07

3.  Factors Associated with Reducing Disparities in Electronic Personal Heath Records Use Among Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic Adults.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Sydney E Manning; Amy F Ho; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Personal Health Records: Beneficial or Burdensome for Patients and Healthcare Providers?

Authors:  Melissa Lester; Samuel Boateng; Jana Studeny; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  The undiscovered country: the future of integrating genomic information into the EHR.

Authors:  Joseph L Kannry; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Growth Dynamics of Patient-Provider Internet Communication: Trend Analysis Using the Health Information National Trends Survey (2003 to 2013).

Authors:  Will L Tarver; Terri Menser; Bradford W Hesse; Tyler J Johnson; Ellen Beckjord; Eric W Ford; Timothy R Huerta
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Patient portals and broadband internet inequality.

Authors:  Adam T Perzynski; Mary Joan Roach; Sarah Shick; Bill Callahan; Douglas Gunzler; Randall Cebul; David C Kaelber; Anne Huml; John Daryl Thornton; Douglas Einstadter
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Awareness and Use of the After-Visit Summary Through a Patient Portal: Evaluation of Patient Characteristics and an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Authors:  Srinivas Emani; Michael Healey; David Y Ting; Stuart R Lipsitz; Harley Ramelson; Vladimir Suric; David W Bates
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Evaluating Patient Empowerment in Association With eHealth Technology: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tracie Risling; Juan Martinez; Jeremy Young; Nancy Thorp-Froslie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Defining Empowerment and Supporting Engagement Using Patient Views From the Citizen Health Information Portal: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Tracie Risling; Juan Martinez; Jeremy Young; Nancy Thorp-Froslie
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.