Literature DB >> 27262436

Genomic selection for wheat traits and trait stability.

Mao Huang1, Antonio Cabrera1, Amber Hoffstetter1, Carl Griffey2, David Van Sanford3, José Costa4, Anne McKendry5, Shiaoman Chao6, Clay Sneller7.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Based on the estimates of accuracy, genomic selection would be useful for selecting for improved trait values and trait stability for agronomic and quality traits in wheat. Trait values and trait stability estimated by two methods were generally independent indicating a breeder could select for both simultaneously. Genomic selection (GS) is a new marker-assisted selection tool for breeders to achieve higher genetic gain faster and cheaper. Breeders face challenges posed by genotype by environment interaction (GEI) pattern and selecting for trait stability. Obtaining trait stability is costly, as it requires data from multiple environments. There are few studies that evaluate the efficacy of GS for predicting trait stability. A soft winter wheat population of 273 lines was genotyped with 90 K single nucleotide polymorphism markers and phenotyped for four agronomic and seven quality traits. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model and  Eberhart and Russell regression (ERR) were used to estimate trait stability. Significant GEI variation was observed and stable lines were identified for all traits in this study. The accuracy of GS ranged from 0.33 to 0.67 for most traits and trait stability. Accuracy of trait stability was greater than trait itself for yield (0.44 using AMMI versus 0.33) and heading date (0.65 using ERR versus 0.56). The opposite trend was observed for the other traits. GS did not predict the stability of the quality traits except for flour protein, lactic acid and softness equivalent. Significant GS accuracy for some trait stability indicated that stability was under genetic control for these traits. The magnitude of GS accuracies for all the traits and most of the trait stability index suggests the possibility of rapid selection for these trait and trait stability in wheat breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27262436     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2733-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  34 in total

1.  A stage-wise approach for the analysis of multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Piepho; Jens Möhring; Torben Schulz-Streeck; Joseph O Ogutu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability.

Authors:  G K Shukla
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 5.  Raising yield potential of wheat. I. Overview of a consortium approach and breeding strategies.

Authors:  Matthew Reynolds; David Bonnett; Scott C Chapman; Robert T Furbank; Yann Manès; Diane E Mather; Martin A J Parry
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  First insights into the genotype-phenotype map of phenotypic stability in rye.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Michael Florian Mette; Thomas Miedaner; Peer Wilde; Jochen C Reif; Yusheng Zhao
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  18 in total

1.  Distinct genetic architectures for phenotype means and plasticities in Zea mays.

Authors:  Aaron Kusmec; Srikant Srinivasan; Dan Nettleton; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 2.  From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat.

Authors:  Awais Rasheed; Xianchun Xia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  A deep convolutional neural network approach for predicting phenotypes from genotypes.

Authors:  Wenlong Ma; Zhixu Qiu; Jie Song; Jiajia Li; Qian Cheng; Jingjing Zhai; Chuang Ma
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Efficient strategies to assess yield stability in winter wheat.

Authors:  Guozheng Liu; Yusheng Zhao; Vilson Mirdita; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Practical application of genomic selection in a doubled-haploid winter wheat breeding program.

Authors:  Jiayin Song; Brett F Carver; Carol Powers; Liuling Yan; Jaroslav Klápště; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Charles Chen
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 6.  Searching for an Accurate Marker-Based Prediction of an Individual Quantitative Trait in Molecular Plant Breeding.

Authors:  Yong-Bi Fu; Mo-Hua Yang; Fangqin Zeng; Bill Biligetu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Historical Datasets Support Genomic Selection Models for the Prediction of Cotton Fiber Quality Phenotypes Across Multiple Environments.

Authors:  Washington Gapare; Shiming Liu; Warren Conaty; Qian-Hao Zhu; Vanessa Gillespie; Danny Llewellyn; Warwick Stiller; Iain Wilson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.

Authors:  Manel Ben Hassen; Jérôme Bartholomé; Giampiero Valè; Tuong-Vi Cao; Nourollah Ahmadi
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat.

Authors:  Kyle Brasier; Brian Ward; Jared Smith; John Seago; Joseph Oakes; Maria Balota; Paul Davis; Myron Fountain; Gina Brown-Guedira; Clay Sneller; Wade Thomason; Carl Griffey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Optimizing Training Population Data and Validation of Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Soft Winter Wheat.

Authors:  Amber Hoffstetter; Antonio Cabrera; Mao Huang; Clay Sneller
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.542

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.