Literature DB >> 24452438

The impact of population structure on genomic prediction in stratified populations.

Zhigang Guo1, Dominic M Tucker, Christopher J Basten, Harish Gandhi, Elhan Ersoz, Baohong Guo, Zhanyou Xu, Daolong Wang, Gilles Gay.   

Abstract

Impacts of population structure on the evaluation of genomic heritability and prediction were investigated and quantified using high-density markers in diverse panels in rice and maize. Population structure is an important factor affecting estimation of genomic heritability and assessment of genomic prediction in stratified populations. In this study, our first objective was to assess effects of population structure on estimations of genomic heritability using the diversity panels in rice and maize. Results indicate population structure explained 33 and 7.5% of genomic heritability for rice and maize, respectively, depending on traits, with the remaining heritability explained by within-subpopulation variation. Estimates of within-subpopulation heritability were higher than that derived from quantitative trait loci identified in genome-wide association studies, suggesting 65% improvement in genetic gains. The second objective was to evaluate effects of population structure on genomic prediction using cross-validation experiments. When population structure exists in both training and validation sets, correcting for population structure led to a significant decrease in accuracy with genomic prediction. In contrast, when prediction was limited to a specific subpopulation, population structure showed little effect on accuracy and within-subpopulation genetic variance dominated predictions. Finally, effects of genomic heritability on genomic prediction were investigated. Accuracies with genomic prediction increased with genomic heritability in both training and validation sets, with the former showing a slightly greater impact. In summary, our results suggest that the population structure contribution to genomic prediction varies based on prediction strategies, and is also affected by the genetic architectures of traits and populations. In practical breeding, these conclusions may be helpful to better understand and utilize the different genetic resources in genomic prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24452438     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2255-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  54 in total

1.  Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods.

Authors:  Gustavo De los Campos; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa; Kent A Weigel; José Crossa
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Does genomic selection have a future in plant breeding?

Authors:  Elisabeth Jonas; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.

Authors:  Shengqiang Zhong; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.

Authors:  Tu Luan; John A Woolliams; Sigbjørn Lien; Matthew Kent; Morten Svendsen; Theo H E Meuwissen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population structure and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Nick Patterson; Alkes L Price; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Anna Bürger; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  50 in total

1.  Genetic Basis of Maize Resistance to Multiple Insect Pests: Integrated Genome-Wide Comparative Mapping and Candidate Gene Prioritization.

Authors:  A Badji; D B Kwemoi; L Machida; D Okii; N Mwila; S Agbahoungba; F Kumi; A Ibanda; A Bararyenya; M Solemanegy; T Odong; P Wasswa; M Otim; G Asea; M Ochwo-Ssemakula; H Talwana; S Kyamanywa; P Rubaihayo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Genomic selection in a commercial winter wheat population.

Authors:  Sang He; Albert Wilhelm Schulthess; Vilson Mirdita; Yusheng Zhao; Viktor Korzun; Reiner Bothe; Erhard Ebmeyer; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genome-based prediction of maize hybrid performance across genetic groups, testers, locations, and years.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Valentin Wimmer; Joseph O Ogutu; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Hans-Peter Piepho; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Accuracy of genomic selection to predict maize single-crosses obtained through different mating designs.

Authors:  Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Deniz Akdemir; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Usefulness of multiparental populations of maize (Zea mays L.) for genome-based prediction.

Authors:  Christina Lehermeier; Nicole Krämer; Eva Bauer; Cyril Bauland; Christian Camisan; Laura Campo; Pascal Flament; Albrecht E Melchinger; Monica Menz; Nina Meyer; Laurence Moreau; Jesús Moreno-González; Milena Ouzunova; Hubert Pausch; Nicolas Ranc; Wolfgang Schipprack; Manfred Schönleben; Hildrun Walter; Alain Charcosset; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Assessment of Genetic Heterogeneity in Structured Plant Populations Using Multivariate Whole-Genome Regression Models.

Authors:  Christina Lehermeier; Chris-Carolin Schön; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic prediction ability for yield-related traits in German winter barley elite material.

Authors:  Patrick Thorwarth; Jutta Ahlemeyer; Anne-Marie Bochard; Kerstin Krumnacker; Hubert Blümel; Eberhard Laubach; Nadine Knöchel; László Cselényi; Frank Ordon; Karl J Schmid
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Evaluation of the utility of gene expression and metabolic information for genomic prediction in maize.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Michael M Magwire; Christopher J Basten; Zhanyou Xu; Daolong Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.