Literature DB >> 26725379

3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing.

R D Sochol1, E Sweet, C C Glick, S Venkatesh, A Avetisyan, K F Ekman, A Raulinaitis, A Tsai, A Wienkers, K Korner, K Hanson, A Long, B J Hightower, G Slatton, D C Burnett, T L Massey, K Iwai, L P Lee, K S J Pister, L Lin.   

Abstract

The miniaturization of integrated fluidic processors affords extensive benefits for chemical and biological fields, yet traditional, monolithic methods of microfabrication present numerous obstacles for the scaling of fluidic operators. Recently, researchers have investigated the use of additive manufacturing or "three-dimensional (3D) printing" technologies - predominantly stereolithography - as a promising alternative for the construction of submillimeter-scale fluidic components. One challenge, however, is that current stereolithography methods lack the ability to simultaneously print sacrificial support materials, which limits the geometric versatility of such approaches. In this work, we investigate the use of multijet modelling (alternatively, polyjet printing) - a layer-by-layer, multi-material inkjetting process - for 3D printing geometrically complex, yet functionally advantageous fluidic components comprised of both static and dynamic physical elements. We examine a fundamental class of 3D printed microfluidic operators, including fluidic capacitors, fluidic diodes, and fluidic transistors. In addition, we evaluate the potential to advance on-chip automation of integrated fluidic systems via geometric modification of component parameters. Theoretical and experimental results for 3D fluidic capacitors demonstrated that transitioning from planar to non-planar diaphragm architectures improved component performance. Flow rectification experiments for 3D printed fluidic diodes revealed a diodicity of 80.6 ± 1.8. Geometry-based gain enhancement for 3D printed fluidic transistors yielded pressure gain of 3.01 ± 0.78. Consistent with additional additive manufacturing methodologies, the use of digitally-transferrable 3D models of fluidic components combined with commercially-available 3D printers could extend the fluidic routing capabilities presented here to researchers in fields beyond the core engineering community.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26725379      PMCID: PMC4979982          DOI: 10.1039/c5lc01389e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  29 in total

1.  Microfluidic large-scale integration.

Authors:  Todd Thorsen; Sebastian J Maerkl; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Uniform cell seeding and generation of overlapping gradient profiles in a multiplexed microchamber device with normally-closed valves.

Authors:  Bobak Mosadegh; Mayank Agarwal; Hossein Tavana; Tommaso Bersano-Begey; Yu-suke Torisawa; Maria Morell; Matthew J Wyatt; K Sue O'Shea; Kate F Barald; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Joanna Skommer; Niall P Macdonald; Timo Friedrich; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Advances in three-dimensional rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices for biological applications.

Authors:  P F O'Neill; A Ben Azouz; M Vázquez; J Liu; S Marczak; Z Slouka; H C Chang; D Diamond; D Brabazon
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Finger-powered microfluidic systems using multilayer soft lithography and injection molding processes.

Authors:  Kosuke Iwai; Kuan Cheng Shih; Xiao Lin; Thomas A Brubaker; Ryan D Sochol; Liwei Lin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  D C Duffy; J C McDonald; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Integrated Elastomeric Components for Autonomous Regulation of Sequential and Oscillatory Flow Switching in Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Bobak Mosadegh; Chuan-Hsien Kuo; Yi-Chung Tung; Yu-Suke Torisawa; Tommaso Bersano-Begey; Hossein Tavana; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 20.034

10.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  30 in total

1.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  High density 3D printed microfluidic valves, pumps, and multiplexers.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  3D-Printing of Functional Biomedical Microdevices via Light- and Extrusion-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Henry H Hwang; Wei Zhu; Grace Victorine; Natalie Lawrence; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2017-12-19

5.  Adhesive bonding strategies to fabricate high-strength and transparent 3D printed microfluidic device.

Authors:  Seren Kecili; H Cumhur Tekin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Encapsulation Approaches for In-Stent Wireless Magnetoelastic Sensors.

Authors:  Jiqing Jiang; Ramprasad Mohanan Nambisan; Scott Green; Yogesh B Gianchandani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Microfluidics for the study of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Christian M Griffith; Stephanie A Huang; Crescentia Cho; Tanmay M Khare; Matthew Rich; Gi-Hun Lee; Frances S Ligler; Brian O Diekman; William J Polacheck
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.207

8.  Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Bryce P Bickham; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

10.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.