Literature DB >> 26339325

Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Feng Zhu1, Joanna Skommer1, Niall P Macdonald2, Timo Friedrich3, Jan Kaslin3, Donald Wlodkowic.   

Abstract

Implementations of Lab-on-a-Chip technologies for in-situ analysis of small model organisms and embryos (both invertebrate and vertebrate) are attracting an increasing interest. A significant hurdle to widespread applications of microfluidic and millifluidic devices for in-situ analysis of small model organisms is the access to expensive clean room facilities and complex microfabrication technologies. Furthermore, these resources require significant investments and engineering know-how. For example, poly(dimethylsiloxane) soft lithography is still largely unattainable to the gross majority of biomedical laboratories willing to pursue development of chip-based platforms. They often turn instead to readily available but inferior classical solutions. We refer to this phenomenon as workshop-to-bench gap of bioengineering science. To tackle the above issues, we examined the capabilities of commercially available Multi-Jet Modelling (MJM) and Stereolithography (SLA) systems for low volume fabrication of optical-grade millifluidic devices designed for culture and biotests performed on millimetre-sized specimens such as zebrafish embryos. The selected 3D printing technologies spanned a range from affordable personal desktop systems to high-end professional printers. The main motivation of our work was to pave the way for off-the-shelf and user-friendly 3D printing methods in order to rapidly and inexpensively build optical-grade millifluidic devices for customized studies on small model organisms. Compared with other rapid prototyping technologies such as soft lithography and infrared laser micromachining in poly(methyl methacrylate), we demonstrate that selected SLA technologies can achieve user-friendly and rapid production of prototypes, superior feature reproduction quality, and comparable levels of optical transparency. A caution need to be, however, exercised as majority of tested SLA and MJM resins were found toxic and caused significant developmental abnormalities in zebrafish embryos. Taken together, our data demonstrate that SLA technologies can be used for rapid and accurate production of devices for biomedical research. However, polymer biotoxicity needs to be carefully evaluated.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26339325      PMCID: PMC4514717          DOI: 10.1063/1.4927379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  25 in total

Review 1.  A brief review of dispensing-based rapid prototyping techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: role of modeling on scaffold properties prediction.

Authors:  M G Li; X Y Tian; X B Chen
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Applications of microfluidics in chemical biology.

Authors:  Douglas B Weibel; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Hype, hope and hubris: the quest for the killer application in microfluidics.

Authors:  Holger Becker
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Biological implications of polymeric microdevices for live cell assays.

Authors:  Donald Wlodkowic; Shannon Faley; Joanna Skommer; Dagmara McGuinness; Jonathan M Cooper
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves.

Authors:  Chad I Rogers; Kamran Qaderi; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Configurable 3D-Printed millifluidic and microfluidic 'lab on a chip' reactionware devices.

Authors:  Philip J Kitson; Mali H Rosnes; Victor Sans; Vincenza Dragone; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Toward embedded laboratory automation for smart Lab-on-a-Chip embryo arrays.

Authors:  Kevin I-Kai Wang; Zoran Salcic; Johnny Yeh; Jin Akagi; Feng Zhu; Chris J Hall; Kathryn E Crosier; Philip S Crosier; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  Miniaturized embryo array for automated trapping, immobilization and microperfusion of zebrafish embryos.

Authors:  Jin Akagi; Khashayar Khoshmanesh; Barbara Evans; Chris J Hall; Kathryn E Crosier; Jonathan M Cooper; Philip S Crosier; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Assessment of the biocompatibility of three-dimensional-printed polymers using multispecies toxicity tests.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Timo Friedrich; Dayanthi Nugegoda; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  3D printed auto-mixing chip enables rapid smartphone diagnosis of anemia.

Authors:  Kimberly Plevniak; Matthew Campbell; Timothy Myers; Abby Hodges; Mei He
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  A Role for 3D Printing in Kidney-on-a-Chip Platforms.

Authors:  Ryan D Sochol; Navin R Gupta; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2016-01-20

5.  3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing.

Authors:  R D Sochol; E Sweet; C C Glick; S Venkatesh; A Avetisyan; K F Ekman; A Raulinaitis; A Tsai; A Wienkers; K Korner; K Hanson; A Long; B J Hightower; G Slatton; D C Burnett; T L Massey; K Iwai; L P Lee; K S J Pister; L Lin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  A 3D-printed microbial cell culture platform with in situ PEGDA hydrogel barriers for differential substrate delivery.

Authors:  Andrea L Kadilak; Jessica C Rehaag; Cameron A Harrington; Leslie M Shor
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Predicting the behavior of microfluidic circuits made from discrete elements.

Authors:  Krisna C Bhargava; Bryant Thompson; Danish Iqbal; Noah Malmstadt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Laminar Flow-Based Microfluidic Tesla Pump via Lithography Enabled 3D Printing.

Authors:  Mohammed-Baker Habhab; Tania Ismail; Joe Fujiou Lo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  3D Printing of Organs-On-Chips.

Authors:  Hee-Gyeong Yi; Hyungseok Lee; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-25

10.  Assessment of biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymers using zebrafish embryo toxicity assays.

Authors:  N P Macdonald; F Zhu; C J Hall; J Reboud; P S Crosier; E E Patton; D Wlodkowic; J M Cooper
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 6.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.