Literature DB >> 28612085

Moving from millifluidic to truly microfluidic sub-100-μm cross-section 3D printed devices.

Michael J Beauchamp1, Gregory P Nordin2, Adam T Woolley3.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has generated considerable excitement in recent years regarding the extensive possibilities of this enabling technology. One area in which 3D printing has potential, not only for positive impact but also for substantial improvement, is microfluidics. To date many researchers have used 3D printers to make fluidic channels directed at point-of-care or lab-on-a-chip applications. Here, we look critically at the cross-sectional sizes of these 3D printed fluidic structures, classifying them as millifluidic (larger than 1 mm), sub-millifluidic (0.5-1.0 mm), large microfluidic (100-500 μm), or truly microfluidic (smaller than 100 μm). Additionally, we provide our prognosis for making 10-100-μm cross-section microfluidic features with custom-formulated resins and stereolithographic printers. Such 3D printed microfluidic devices for bioanalysis will accelerate research through designs that can be easily created and modified, allowing improved assays to be developed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioanalytical methods; Microfluidics/microfabrication; Separations/instrumentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28612085      PMCID: PMC5542000          DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0398-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  34 in total

1.  Three-dimensional printed millifluidic devices for zebrafish embryo tests.

Authors:  Feng Zhu; Joanna Skommer; Niall P Macdonald; Timo Friedrich; Jan Kaslin; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Ultrarapid detection of pathogenic bacteria using a 3D immunomagnetic flow assay.

Authors:  Wonjae Lee; Donghoon Kwon; Boram Chung; Gyoo Yeol Jung; Anthony Au; Albert Folch; Sangmin Jeon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Adding Biomolecular Recognition Capability to 3D Printed Objects.

Authors:  Céline A Mandon; Loïc J Blum; Christophe A Marquette
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  High density 3D printed microfluidic valves, pumps, and multiplexers.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Customisable 3D printed microfluidics for integrated analysis and optimisation.

Authors:  T Monaghan; M J Harding; R A Harris; R J Friel; S D R Christie
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing.

Authors:  R D Sochol; E Sweet; C C Glick; S Venkatesh; A Avetisyan; K F Ekman; A Raulinaitis; A Tsai; A Wienkers; K Korner; K Hanson; A Long; B J Hightower; G Slatton; D C Burnett; T L Massey; K Iwai; L P Lee; K S J Pister; L Lin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  Optical Approach to Resin Formulation for 3D Printed Microfluidics.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Michael Beauchamp; Steven Perry; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.361

9.  Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wonjae Lee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

10.  3D Printed Micro Free-Flow Electrophoresis Device.

Authors:  Sarah K Anciaux; Matthew Geiger; Michael T Bowser
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  25 in total

1.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Solid-Phase Extraction and On-Chip Fluorescent Labeling of Preterm Birth Risk Biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna V Bickham; Chao Pang; Benjamin Q George; David J Topham; Jacob B Nielsen; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Recent advances in microfluidic sample preparation and separation techniques for molecular biomarker analysis: A critical review.

Authors:  Mukul Sonker; Vishal Sahore; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Microchip electrophoresis separation of a panel of preterm birth biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna V Nielsen; Jacob B Nielsen; Mukul Sonker; Radim Knob; Vishal Sahore; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  3D-printed miniaturized fluidic tools in chemistry and biology.

Authors:  C K Dixit; K Kadimisetty; J Rusling
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 12.296

5.  3D-printed Quake-style microvalves and micropumps.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Lee; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Anna V Nielsen; Hua Gong; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Biocompatible PEGDA Resin for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Chandler Warr; Jonard Corpuz Valdoz; Bryce P Bickham; Connor J Knight; Nicholas A Franks; Nicholas Chartrand; Pam M Van Ry; Kenneth A Christensen; Gregory P Nordin; Alonzo D Cook
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 8.  3D Printed Microfluidics.

Authors:  Anna V Nielsen; Michael J Beauchamp; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 10.745

9.  3D-printed microchip electrophoresis device containing spiral electrodes for integrated capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection.

Authors:  Brenda M C Costa; Aline G Coelho; Michael J Beauchamp; Jacob B Nielsen; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley; José A F da Silva
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 10.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.