Literature DB >> 28726927

Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 μm × 20 μm microfluidic flow channels.

Hua Gong1, Bryce P Bickham, Adam T Woolley, Gregory P Nordin.   

Abstract

While there is great interest in 3D printing for microfluidic device fabrication, to-date the achieved feature sizes have not been in the truly microfluidic regime (<100 μm). In this paper we demonstrate that a custom digital light processor stereolithographic (DLP-SLA) 3D printer and a specifically-designed, low cost, custom resin can readily achieve flow channel cross sections as small as 18 μm × 20 μm. Our 3D printer has a projected image plane resolution of 7.6 μm and uses a 385 nm LED, which dramatically increases the available selection of UV absorbers for resin formulation compared to 3D printers with 405 nm LEDs. Beginning with 20 candidate absorbers, we demonstrate the evaluation criteria and process flow required to develop a high-resolution resin. In doing so, we introduce a new mathematical model for characterizing the resin optical penetration depth based only on measurement of the absorber's molar absorptivity. Our final resin formulation uses 2-nitrophenyl phenyl sulfide (NPS) as the UV absorber. We also develop a novel channel narrowing technique that, together with the new resin and 3D printer resolution, enables small flow channel fabrication. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by fabricating 3D serpentine flow channels 41 mm long in a volume of only 0.12 mm3, and by printing high aspect ratio flow channels <25 μm wide and 3 mm tall. These results indicate that 3D printing is finally positioned to challenge the pre-eminence of methods such as soft lithography for microfluidic device prototyping and fabrication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726927      PMCID: PMC5571981          DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00644f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  19 in total

Review 1.  3D printed microfluidics for biological applications.

Authors:  Chee Meng Benjamin Ho; Sum Huan Ng; King Ho Holden Li; Yong-Jin Yoon
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 2.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers.

Authors:  Sidra Waheed; Joan M Cabot; Niall P Macdonald; Trevor Lewis; Rosanne M Guijt; Brett Paull; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.

Authors:  Niall P Macdonald; Joan M Cabot; Petr Smejkal; Rosanne M Guijt; Brett Paull; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  3D printed microfluidic circuitry via multijet-based additive manufacturing.

Authors:  R D Sochol; E Sweet; C C Glick; S Venkatesh; A Avetisyan; K F Ekman; A Raulinaitis; A Tsai; A Wienkers; K Korner; K Hanson; A Long; B J Hightower; G Slatton; D C Burnett; T L Massey; K Iwai; L P Lee; K S J Pister; L Lin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Electrochemiluminescence at Bare and DNA-Coated Graphite Electrodes in 3D-Printed Fluidic Devices.

Authors:  Gregory W Bishop; Jennifer E Satterwhite-Warden; Itti Bist; Eric Chen; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 7.711

8.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  DNA Assembly in 3D Printed Fluidics.

Authors:  William G Patrick; Alec A K Nielsen; Steven J Keating; Taylor J Levy; Che-Wei Wang; Jaime J Rivera; Octavio Mondragón-Palomino; Peter A Carr; Christopher A Voigt; Neri Oxman; David S Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simple and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament Fabrication.

Authors:  Alex J L Morgan; Lorena Hidalgo San Jose; William D Jamieson; Jennifer M Wymant; Bing Song; Phil Stephens; David A Barrow; Oliver K Castell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  63 in total

1.  Desktop-Stereolithography 3D-Printing of a Poly(dimethylsiloxane)-Based Material with Sylgard-184 Properties.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Cesar Parra-Cabrera; Yong Tae Kim; Alexandra P Kuo; Albert Folch
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  High-Precision Stereolithography of Biomicrofluidic Devices.

Authors:  Alexandra P Kuo; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Yuan-Sheng Lee; Kurt Castro; Yong Tae Kim; Albert Folch
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2019-01-03

Review 3.  Challenging Bioanalyses with Capillary Electrophoresis.

Authors:  Courtney J Kristoff; Lloyd Bwanali; Lindsay M Veltri; Gayatri P Gautam; Patrick K Rutto; Ebenezer O Newton; Lisa A Holland
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Self-Sustaining 3D Thin Liquid Films in Ambient Environments.

Authors:  Ryan M Camacho; Davin Fish; Matthew Simmons; Parker Awerkamp; Rebecca Anderson; Stephanie Carlson; Joshua Laney; Matthew Viglione; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Adv Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.147

5.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Solid-Phase Extraction and On-Chip Fluorescent Labeling of Preterm Birth Risk Biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna V Bickham; Chao Pang; Benjamin Q George; David J Topham; Jacob B Nielsen; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Microchip electrophoresis separation of a panel of preterm birth biomarkers.

Authors:  Anna V Nielsen; Jacob B Nielsen; Mukul Sonker; Radim Knob; Vishal Sahore; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 7.  Microfluidics: Innovations in Materials and Their Fabrication and Functionalization.

Authors:  Jacob B Nielsen; Robert L Hanson; Haifa M Almughamsi; Chao Pang; Taylor R Fish; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  3D-printed Quake-style microvalves and micropumps.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Lee; Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Beauchamp; Anna V Nielsen; Hua Gong; Gregory P Nordin; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Biocompatible PEGDA Resin for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Chandler Warr; Jonard Corpuz Valdoz; Bryce P Bickham; Connor J Knight; Nicholas A Franks; Nicholas Chartrand; Pam M Van Ry; Kenneth A Christensen; Gregory P Nordin; Alonzo D Cook
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2020-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.