Literature DB >> 32341724

Adhesive bonding strategies to fabricate high-strength and transparent 3D printed microfluidic device.

Seren Kecili1, H Cumhur Tekin1.   

Abstract

Recently, the use of 3D printing technologies has become prevalent in microfluidic applications. Although these technologies enable low-cost, rapid, and easy fabrication of microfluidic devices, fabricated devices suffer from optical opaqueness that inhibits their use for microscopic imaging. This study investigates bonding strategies using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and printer resin as interlayer materials to fabricate high-strength optically transparent 3D-printed microfluidic devices. First, we fabricated microfluidic structures using a stereolithography 3D printer. We placed 3D-printed structures on interlayer materials coated surfaces. Then, we either let these 3D-printed structures rest on the coated slides or transferred them to new glass slides. We achieved bonding between 3D-printed structures and glass substrates with UV exposure for resin and with elevated temperature for PDMS interlayer materials. Bonding strength was investigated for different interlayer material thicknesses. We also analyzed the bright-field and fluorescence imaging capability of microfluidic devices fabricated using different bonding strategies. We achieve up to twofold (9.1 bar) improved bonding strength and comparable fluorescence sensitivity with respect to microfluidic devices fabricated using the traditional plasma activated PDMS-glass bonding method. Although stereolithography 3D printer allows fabrication of enclosed channels having dimensions down to ∼600 μm, monolithic transparent microfluidic channels with 280 × 110 μm2 cross section can be realized using adhesive interlayers. Furthermore, 3D-printed microfluidic chips can be integrated successfully with Protein-G modified substrates using resin interlayers for detection of fluorescent-labeled immunoglobulin down to ∼30 ng/ml. Hence, this strategy can be applied to fabricate high-strength and transparent microfluidic chips for various optical imaging applications including biosensing.
Copyright © 2020 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341724      PMCID: PMC7173975          DOI: 10.1063/5.0003302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  29 in total

1.  Microfluidic very large scale integration (mVLSI) with integrated micromechanical valves.

Authors:  Ismail Emre Araci; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Molecular indications of protein damage in adenoviruses after UV disinfection.

Authors:  Anne C Eischeid; Karl G Linden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  3D printed microfluidics for biological applications.

Authors:  Chee Meng Benjamin Ho; Sum Huan Ng; King Ho Holden Li; Yong-Jin Yoon
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Inkjet printing of UV-curable adhesive and dielectric inks for microfluidic devices.

Authors:  E M Hamad; S E R Bilatto; N Y Adly; D S Correa; B Wolfrum; M J Schöning; A Offenhäusser; A Yakushenko
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 5.  The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Arturo Urrios; Shawn Kang; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Three-dimensional printing of transparent fused silica glass.

Authors:  Frederik Kotz; Karl Arnold; Werner Bauer; Dieter Schild; Nico Keller; Kai Sachsenheimer; Tobias M Nargang; Christiane Richter; Dorothea Helmer; Bastian E Rapp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Polymer Coatings in 3D-Printed Fluidic Device Channels for Improved Cellular Adherence Prior to Electrical Lysis.

Authors:  Bethany C Gross; Kari B Anderson; Jayda E Meisel; Megan I McNitt; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes.

Authors:  Aliaa I Shallan; Petr Smejkal; Monika Corban; Rosanne M Guijt; Michael C Breadmore
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Attomolar protein detection using a magnetic bead surface coverage assay.

Authors:  H Cumhur Tekin; Matteo Cornaglia; Martin A M Gijs
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic-based virus detection methods for respiratory diseases.

Authors:  E Alperay Tarim; Betul Karakuzu; Cemre Oksuz; Oyku Sarigil; Melike Kizilkaya; Mahmoud Khatib A A Al-Ruweidi; Huseyin Cagatay Yalcin; Engin Ozcivici; H Cumhur Tekin
Journal:  Emergent Mater       Date:  2021-03-25

2.  Processing and Profile Control of Microhole Array for PDMS Mask with Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Xifang Zhang; Zhenqiang Yao; Zhibao Hou; Jiacheng Song
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 3.  Utilizing Electrochemical-Based Sensing Approaches for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples: A Review.

Authors:  Nor Syafirah Zambry; Godwin Attah Obande; Muhammad Fazli Khalid; Yazmin Bustami; Hairul Hisham Hamzah; Mohd Syafiq Awang; Ismail Aziah; Asrulnizam Abd Manaf
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.