Literature DB >> 29472694

Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials.

Kaio Olímpio Das Graças Dias1,2, Salvador Alejandro Gezan3, Claudia Teixeira Guimarães4, Alireza Nazarian3, Luciano da Costa E Silva5, Sidney Netto Parentoni4, Paulo Evaristo de Oliveira Guimarães4, Carina de Oliveira Anoni2, José Maria Villela Pádua1, Marcos de Oliveira Pinto4, Roberto Willians Noda4, Carlos Alexandre Gomes Ribeiro6, Jurandir Vieira de Magalhães4, Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia2, João Cândido de Souza1, Lauro José Moreira Guimarães7, Maria Marta Pastina8.   

Abstract

Breeding for drought tolerance is a challenging task that requires costly, extensive, and precise phenotyping. Genomic selection (GS) can be used to maximize selection efficiency and the genetic gains in maize (Zea mays L.) breeding programs for drought tolerance. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) using additive (A) and additive + dominance (AD) models to predict the performance of untested maize single-cross hybrids for drought tolerance in multi-environment trials. Phenotypic data of five drought tolerance traits were measured in 308 hybrids along eight trials under water-stressed (WS) and well-watered (WW) conditions over two years and two locations in Brazil. Hybrids' genotypes were inferred based on their parents' genotypes (inbred lines) using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers obtained via genotyping-by-sequencing. GS analyses were performed using genomic best linear unbiased prediction by fitting a factor analytic (FA) multiplicative mixed model. Two cross-validation (CV) schemes were tested: CV1 and CV2. The FA framework allowed for investigating the stability of additive and dominance effects across environments, as well as the additive-by-environment and the dominance-by-environment interactions, with interesting applications for parental and hybrid selection. Results showed differences in the predictive accuracy between A and AD models, using both CV1 and CV2, for the five traits in both water conditions. For grain yield (GY) under WS and using CV1, the AD model doubled the predictive accuracy in comparison to the A model. Through CV2, GS models benefit from borrowing information of correlated trials, resulting in an increase of 40% and 9% in the predictive accuracy of GY under WS for A and AD models, respectively. These results highlight the importance of multi-environment trial analyses using GS models that incorporate additive and dominance effects for genomic predictions of GY under drought in maize single-cross hybrids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29472694      PMCID: PMC5997769          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0053-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  37 in total

1.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  GenoMatrix: A Software Package for Pedigree-Based and Genomic Prediction Analyses on Complex Traits.

Authors:  Alireza Nazarian; Salvador Alejandro Gezan
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product.

Authors:  Mark Cooper; Carla Gho; Roger Leafgren; Tom Tang; Carlos Messina
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era.

Authors:  Roberto Tuberosa
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Factor-analytic models for genotype x environment type problems and structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  Karin Meyer
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Estimation in a multiplicative mixed model involving a genetic relationship matrix.

Authors:  Alison M Kelly; Brian R Cullis; Arthur R Gilmour; John A Eccleston; Robin Thompson
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  17 in total

1.  Heritability in Plant Breeding on a Genotype-Difference Basis.

Authors:  Paul Schmidt; Jens Hartung; Jörn Bennewitz; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Leveraging probability concepts for cultivar recommendation in multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Kaio O G Dias; Jhonathan P R Dos Santos; Matheus D Krause; Hans-Peter Piepho; Lauro J M Guimarães; Maria M Pastina; Antonio A F Garcia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage.

Authors:  Alizarine Lorenzi; Cyril Bauland; Tristan Mary-Huard; Sophie Pin; Carine Palaffre; Colin Guillaume; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.574

4.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 5.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.

Authors:  K O G Dias; H P Piepho; L J M Guimarães; P E O Guimarães; S N Parentoni; M O Pinto; R W Noda; J V Magalhães; C T Guimarães; A A F Garcia; M M Pastina
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genomic prediction applied to multiple traits and environments in second season maize hybrids.

Authors:  Amanda Avelar de Oliveira; Marcio F R Resende; Luís Felipe Ventorim Ferrão; Rodrigo Rampazo Amadeu; Lauro José Moreira Guimarães; Claudia Teixeira Guimarães; Maria Marta Pastina; Gabriel Rodrigues Alves Margarido
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Improved genomic prediction of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects.

Authors:  Seema Yadav; Xianming Wei; Priya Joyce; Felicity Atkin; Emily Deomano; Yue Sun; Loan T Nguyen; Elizabeth M Ross; Tony Cavallaro; Karen S Aitken; Ben J Hayes; Kai P Voss-Fels
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.574

9.  Optimizing Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Small-Scale Maize Hybrid Breeding Programs: A Roadmap Review.

Authors:  Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Giovanni Galli; Karina Lima Reis Borges; Germano Costa-Neto; Filipe Couto Alves; Felipe Sabadin; Danilo Hottis Lyra; Pedro Patric Pinho Morais; Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade; Italo Granato; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize.

Authors:  Xiaogang Liu; Hongwu Wang; Xiaojiao Hu; Kun Li; Zhifang Liu; Yujin Wu; Changling Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.