Literature DB >> 26703411

The State of Medical Student Performance Evaluations: Improved Transparency or Continued Obfuscation?

Jason Hom1, Ilana Richman, Philip Hall, Neera Ahuja, Stephanie Harman, Robert Harrington, Ronald Witteles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The medical student performance evaluation (MSPE), a letter summarizing academic performance, is included in each medical student's residency application. The extent to which medical schools follow Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recommendations for comparative and transparent data is not known. This study's purpose was to describe the content, interpretability, and transparency of MSPEs.
METHOD: This cross-sectional study examined one randomly selected MSPE from every Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S. medical school from which at least one student applied to the Stanford University internal medical residency program during the 2013-2014 application cycle. The authors described the number, distribution, and range of key words and clerkship grades used in the MSPEs and the proportions of schools with missing or incomplete data.
RESULTS: The sample included MSPEs from 117 (89%) of 131 medical schools. Sixty schools (51%) provided complete information about clerkship grade and key word distributions. Ninety-six (82%) provided comparative data for clerkship grades, and 71 (61%) provided complete key word data. Key words describing overall performance were extremely heterogeneous, with a total of 72 used and great variation in the assignment of the top designation (median: 24% of students; range: 1%-60%). There was also great variation in the proportion of students awarded the top internal medicine clerkship grade (median: 29%; range: 2%-90%).
CONCLUSIONS: The MSPE is a critical component of residency applications, yet data contained within MSPEs are incomplete and variable. Approximately half of U.S. medical schools do not follow AAMC guidelines for MSPEs.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26703411     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  The AAMC Medical Student Performance Evaluation Task Force Recommendations: Do They Go Far Enough?

Authors:  Jillian S Catalanotti; Kathryn M Andolsek; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

2.  Exploring Perspectives from Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in the USA on Effective Narrative Evaluation: Results from the CDIM National Survey.

Authors:  Robert Ledford; Alfred Burger; Jeff LaRochelle; Farina Klocksieben; Deborah DeWaay; Kevin E O'Brien
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-10-25

3.  Current State of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: A Tool for Reflection for Residency Programs.

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Jeffrey B Bird; Jason Brenner; David Orner; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  A Retrospective Analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations, 2014-2020: Recommend with Reservations.

Authors:  Rebecca L Tisdale; Amy R Filsoof; Surbhi Singhal; Wendy Cáceres; Shriram Nallamshetty; Angela J Rogers; Abraham C Verghese; Robert A Harrington; Ronald M Witteles
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of the Evidence Supporting Factors Used by Residency Program Directors to Select Applicants for Interviews.

Authors:  Nicholas D Hartman; Cedric W Lefebvre; David E Manthey
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-06

6.  Which Applicant Factors Predict Success in Emergency Medicine Training Programs? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Allen Yang; Chris Gilani; Soheil Saadat; Linda Murphy; Shannon Toohey; Megan Boysen-Osborn
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-01-08

Review 7.  Systems-Level Reforms to the US Resident Selection Process: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryley K Zastrow; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Daniel A London
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 8.  Review of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: analysis of the end-users' perspective across the specialties.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Bird; Karen A Friedman; Thurayya Arayssi; Doreen M Olvet; Rosemarie L Conigliaro; Judith M Brenner
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

9.  Compliance with CDIM-APDIM Guidelines for Department of Medicine Letters: an Opportunity to Improve Communication Across the Continuum.

Authors:  Allison H Ferris; Anne G Pereira; Steven V Angus; Richard I Kopelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?

Authors:  Mitchell M Huang; Marisa M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.