Literature DB >> 33606615

Review of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: analysis of the end-users' perspective across the specialties.

Jeffrey B Bird1, Karen A Friedman2, Thurayya Arayssi3, Doreen M Olvet4, Rosemarie L Conigliaro5, Judith M Brenner6.   

Abstract

The Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) is an important tool of communication used by program directors to make decisions in the residency application process. To understand the perspective and usage of the MSPE across multiple medical specialties now and in anticipation of the planned changes in USMLE Step 1 score-reporting. A survey instrument including quantitative and qualitative measures was developed and piloted. The final survey was distributed to residency programs across 28 specialties in 2020 via the main contact on the ACGME listserv. Of the 28 specialties surveyed, at least one response was received from 26 (93%). Eight percent of all programs (364/4675) responded to the survey, with most respondents being program directors. Usage of the MSPE varied among specialties. Approximately 1/3 of end-users stated that the MSPE is very or extremely influential in their initial screening process. Slightly less than half agreed or strongly agreed that they trust the information to be an accurate representation of applicants, though slightly more than half agree that the MSPE will become more influential once USMLE Step 1 becomes pass/fail. Professionalism was rated as the most important component and noteworthy characteristics among the least important in the decision-making process. Performance in the internal medicine clerkship was rated as the most influential while neurology and psychiatry performances were rated as less influential. Overwhelmingly, respondents suggested that including comparative performance and/or class rank would make the MSPE more useful once USMLE Step 1 becomes pass/fail. MSPE end-users across a variety of specialties utilize this complex document in different ways and value it differentially in their decision-making processes. Despite this, continued mistrust of the MSPE persists. A better understanding of end-users' perceptions of the MSPE offers the UME community an opportunity to transform the MSPE into a highly valued, trusted document of communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSPE; assessment data; dean’s letter; educational handoff; residency application; ume; undergraduate medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606615      PMCID: PMC7899642          DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1876315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ Online        ISSN: 1087-2981


  20 in total

1.  A Plea to Reassess the Role of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scores in Residency Selection.

Authors:  Charles G Prober; Joseph C Kolars; Lewis R First; Donald E Melnick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Evaluation of Medical School Grading Variability in the United States: Are All Honors the Same?

Authors:  Mary E Westerman; Chelsea Boe; Raevti Bole; Norman S Turner; Steven H Rose; Matthew T Gettman; R Houston Thompson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) 2017 Task Force Recommendations as Reflected in the Format of 2018 MSPE.

Authors:  Daniel Giang
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Grading in Medical School.

Authors:  Daniel Low; Samantha W Pollack; Zachary C Liao; Ramoncita Maestas; Larry E Kirven; Anne M Eacker; Leo S Morales
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  The AAMC Medical Student Performance Evaluation Task Force Recommendations: Do They Go Far Enough?

Authors:  Jillian S Catalanotti; Kathryn M Andolsek; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

6.  Improving the Medical Student Performance Evaluation to Facilitate Resident Selection.

Authors:  Kathryn M Andolsek
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Standardization in the MSPE: Key Tensions for Learners, Schools, and Residency Programs.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Daniel Giang; Meghan E Kapp; Robert Sterling
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Potential Implications of COVID-19 for the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle.

Authors:  Maya M Hammoud; Taylor Standiford; J Bryan Carmody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The Revised Medical School Performance Evaluation: Does It Meet the Needs of Its Readers?

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Thurayya Arayssi; Rosemarie L Conigliaro; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

10.  Impact of the final adjective in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation on determination of applicant desirability.

Authors:  Mark A Ward; Debra L Palazzi; Martin I Lorin; Anoop Agrawal; Hilel Frankenthal; Teri L Turner
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Current State of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: A Tool for Reflection for Residency Programs.

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Jeffrey B Bird; Jason Brenner; David Orner; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

2.  A Generalizable Approach to Predicting Performance on USMLE Step 2 CK.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Bird; Doreen M Olvet; Joanne M Willey; Judith M Brenner
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.