Literature DB >> 35710660

A Retrospective Analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations, 2014-2020: Recommend with Reservations.

Rebecca L Tisdale1,2, Amy R Filsoof3, Surbhi Singhal3, Wendy Cáceres3, Shriram Nallamshetty4,3, Angela J Rogers3, Abraham C Verghese3, Robert A Harrington3, Ronald M Witteles3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Medical Student Performance Evaluations (MSPE) is a cornerstone of residency applications. Little is known regarding adherence to Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) MSPE recommendations and longitudinal changes in MSPE content.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate current MSPE quality and longitudinal changes in MSPE and grading practices.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Students from all Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools from which the Stanford University Internal Medicine residency program received applications between 2014-2015 and 2019-2020. MAIN MEASURES: Inclusion of key words to describe applicant performance and metrics thereof, including distribution among students and key word assignment explanation; inclusion of clerkship grades, grade distributions, and grade composition; and evidence of grade inflation over time. KEY
RESULTS: MSPE comprehensiveness varied substantially among the 149 schools analyzed. In total, 25% of schools provided complete information consistent with AAMC recommendations regarding key word/categorization of medical students and clerkship grades in 2019-2020. Seventy-seven distinct key word terms appeared across the 139 schools examined in 2019-2020. Grading practices markedly varied, with 2-83% of students receiving the top internal medicine clerkship grade depending on the year and school. Individual schools frequently changed key word and grading practices, with 33% and 18% of schools starting and/or stopping use of key words and grades, respectively. Significant grade inflation occurred over the 6-year study period, with an average 14% relative increase in the proportion of students receiving top clerkship grades.
CONCLUSIONS: A minority of schools complies with AAMC MSPE guidelines, and MSPEs are inconsistent across time and schools. These practices may impair evaluation of students within and between schools.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  graduate medical education; undergraduate medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35710660      PMCID: PMC9296706          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07502-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  22 in total

Review 1.  Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alyssa Stephenson-Famy; Brenda S Houmard; Sidharth Oberoi; Anton Manyak; Seine Chiang; Sara Kim
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

2.  The personal interview: assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents.

Authors:  Andres J Quintero; Lee S Segal; Tonya S King; Kevin P Black
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The Revised 2017 MSPE: Better, But Not "Outstanding".

Authors:  Lauren Hook; Aitua C Salami; Tenesha Diaz; Kara E Friend; Alisan Fathalizadeh; Amit R T Joshi
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Core Clerkship Grading: The Illusion of Objectivity.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Catherine R Lucey
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  All Other Things Being Equal: Exploring Racial and Gender Disparities in Medical School Honor Society Induction.

Authors:  Thilan P Wijesekera; Margeum Kim; Edward Z Moore; Olav Sorenson; David A Ross
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Standardization in the MSPE: Key Tensions for Learners, Schools, and Residency Programs.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Daniel Giang; Meghan E Kapp; Robert Sterling
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  A Framework for Inclusive Graduate Medical Education Recruitment Strategies: Meeting the ACGME Standard for a Diverse and Inclusive Workforce.

Authors:  Alda Maria R Gonzaga; James Appiah-Pippim; Chavon M Onumah; Maria A Yialamas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The Revised Medical School Performance Evaluation: Does It Meet the Needs of Its Readers?

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Thurayya Arayssi; Rosemarie L Conigliaro; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

9.  Differences in words used to describe racial and gender groups in Medical Student Performance Evaluations.

Authors:  David A Ross; Dowin Boatright; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Ayana Jordan; Adam Chekroud; Edward Z Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Emergency Medicine Residency Selection Criteria: An Update and Comparison.

Authors:  Matthew Negaard; Evangelia Assimacopoulos; Karisa Harland; Jon Van Heukelom
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-03-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Consequence in Competency-Based Education: Individualize, but Do Not Compromise.

Authors:  Katherine Gielissen; Lia Logio; Kelli Qua; Paul Hemmer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 6.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.