Literature DB >> 17254989

Rapid jamming avoidance in biosonar.

Erin H Gillam1, Nachum Ulanovsky, Gary F McCracken.   

Abstract

The sonar systems of bats and dolphins are in many ways superior to man-made sonar and radar systems, and considerable effort has been devoted to understanding the signal-processing strategies underlying these capabilities. A major feature determining the efficiency of sonar systems is the sensitivity to noise and jamming signals. Previous studies indicated that echolocating bats may adjust their signal structure to avoid jamming ('jamming avoidance response'; JAR). However, these studies relied on behavioural correlations and not controlled experiments. Here, we provide the first experimental evidence for JAR in bats. We presented bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) with 'playback stimuli' consisting of recorded echolocation calls at one of six frequencies. The bats exhibited a JAR by shifting their call frequency away from the presented playback frequency. When the approaching bats were challenged by an abrupt change in the playback stimulus, they responded by shifting their call frequencies upwards, away from the playback. Interestingly, even bats initially calling below the playback's frequency shifted their frequencies upwards, 'jumping' over the playback frequency. These spectral shifts in the bats' calls occurred often within less than 200 ms, in the first echolocation call emitted after the stimulus switch-suggesting that rapid jamming avoidance is important for the bat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254989      PMCID: PMC2197216          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  No cost of echolocation for bats in flight.

Authors:  J R Speakman; P A Racey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Sensory hyperacuity in the jamming avoidance response of weakly electric fish.

Authors:  M Kawasaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  A Surlykke; C F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation.

Authors:  N Suga; H Niwa; I Taniguchi; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motor control of the jamming avoidance response of Apteronotus leptorhynchus: evolutionary changes of a behavior and its neuronal substrates.

Authors:  W Heiligenberg; W Metzner; C J Wong; C H Keller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; M Brock Fenton; Asaf Tsoar; Carmi Korine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Neural circuitry for communication and jamming avoidance in gymnotiform electric fish.

Authors:  W Metzner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  What the bat's voice tells the bat's brain.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-23

6.  Regulation of bat echolocation pulse acoustics by striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Jedediah Tressler; Christine Schwartz; Paul Wellman; Samuel Hughes; Michael Smotherman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.

Authors:  Noam Cvikel; Eran Levin; Edward Hurme; Ivailo Borissov; Arjan Boonman; Eran Amichai; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mapping vocalization-related immediate early gene expression in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Christine P Schwartz; Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Probing the natural scene by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.