Literature DB >> 23431172

Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Steffen R Hage1, Tinglei Jiang, Sean W Berquist, Jiang Feng, Walter Metzner.   

Abstract

The Lombard effect, an involuntary rise in call amplitude in response to masking ambient noise, represents one of the most efficient mechanisms to optimize signal-to-noise ratio. The Lombard effect occurs in birds and mammals, including humans, and is often associated with several other vocal changes, such as call frequency and duration. Most studies, however, have focused on noise-dependent changes in call amplitude. It is therefore still largely unknown how the adaptive changes in call amplitude relate to associated vocal changes such as frequency shifts, how the underlying mechanisms are linked, and if auditory feedback from the changing vocal output is needed. Here, we examined the Lombard effect and the associated changes in call frequency in a highly vocal mammal, echolocating horseshoe bats. We analyzed how bandpass-filtered noise (BFN; bandwidth 20 kHz) affected their echolocation behavior when BFN was centered on different frequencies within their hearing range. Call amplitudes increased only when BFN was centered on the dominant frequency component of the bats' calls. In contrast, call frequencies increased for all but one BFN center frequency tested. Both amplitude and frequency rises were extremely fast and occurred in the first call uttered after noise onset, suggesting that no auditory feedback was required. The different effects that varying the BFN center frequency had on amplitude and frequency rises indicate different neural circuits and/or mechanisms underlying these changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23431172      PMCID: PMC3593919          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211533110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Spectral and temporal gating mechanisms enhance the clutter rejection in the echolocating bat, Rhinolophus rouxi.

Authors:  I Neumann; G Schuller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  On the role of the pontine brainstem in vocal pattern generation: a telemetric single-unit recording study in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Uwe Jürgens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating rats.

Authors:  N Suga; P Schlegel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Audio-vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Uwe Jürgens; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J B Kobler; B S Wilson; O W Henson; A L Bishop
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; C R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Neuronal activity in the inferior colliculus and bordering structures during vocalization in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  Florian Pieper; Uwe Jürgens
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  29 in total

1.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Ninad B Kothari; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Audio-vocal interactions during vocal communication in squirrel monkeys and their neurobiological implications.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ambient noise causes independent changes in distinct spectro-temporal features of echolocation calls in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Airport noise disturbs foraging behavior of Japanese pipistrelle bats.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Huimin Gao; Chengrong Li; Yingchun Deng; Daying Zhou; Yaqi Li; Wenyu Zhou; Bo Luo; Haiying Liang; Wenqin Liu; Pan Wu; Wang Jing; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

9.  Mining noise affects loud call structures and emission patterns of wild black-fronted titi monkeys.

Authors:  M H L Duarte; M C Kaizer; R J Young; M Rodrigues; R S Sousa-Lima
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Noise-Induced Frequency Modifications of Tamarin Vocalizations: Implications for Noise Compensation in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.