Literature DB >> 19322570

Interpulse interval modulation by echolocating big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in different densities of obstacle clutter.

Anthony E Petrites1, Oliver S Eng, Donald S Mowlds, James A Simmons, Caroline M DeLong.   

Abstract

Big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) use biosonar to find insect prey in open areas, but they also find prey near vegetation and even fly through vegetation when in transit from roosts to feeding sites. To evaluate their reactions to dense, distributed clutter, bats were tested in an obstacle array consisting of rows of vertically hanging chains. Chains were removed from the array to create a curved corridor of three clutter densities (high, medium, low). Bats flew along this path to receive a food reward after landing on the far wall. Interpulse intervals (IPIs) varied across clutter densities to reflect different compromises between using short IPIs for gathering echoes rapidly enough to maneuver past the nearest chains and using longer IPIs so that all echoes from one sound can be received before the next sound is emitted. In high-clutter density, IPIs were uniformly shorter (20-65 ms) than in medium and low densities (40-100 ms) and arranged in "strobe groups," with some overlap of echo streams from different broadcasts, causing pulse-echo ambiguity. As previously proposed, alternating short and long IPIs in strobe groups may allow bats to focus on large-scale pathfinding tasks as well as close-in obstacle avoidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19322570     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0435-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  18 in total

1.  Sonar gain control and echo detection thresholds in the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; A J Moffat; W M Masters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Doppler-shift compensation in the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) recorded with a telemetry microphone system during flight.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Koji Katsura; Liang-Kong Lin; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  C F Moss; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M B Fenton; M J O'Farrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stabilization of perceived echo amplitudes in echolocating bats. II. The acoustic behavior of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, when tracking moving prey.

Authors:  D J Hartley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Biosonar signals impinging on the target during interception by big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  Prestor A Saillant; James A Simmons; Frederick H Bouffard; David N Lee; Steven P Dear
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The synchronisation of signal emission with wingbeat during the approach phase in soprano pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus).

Authors:  J G Wong; D A Waters
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Active listening for spatial orientation in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Cynthia F Moss; Kari Bohn; Hannah Gilkenson; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Plant classification from bat-like echolocation signals.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias Otto Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  33 in total

1.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast-echo ambiguity in clutter.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Mary E Bates; James A Simmons; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tight coordination of aerial flight maneuvers and sonar call production in insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Joseph Kasnadi; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.

Authors:  Eran Amichai; Gaddi Blumrosen; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Duration tuning in the auditory midbrain of echolocating and non-echolocating vertebrates.

Authors:  Riziq Sayegh; Brandon Aubie; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments.

Authors:  Benjamin Falk; Lasse Jakobsen; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Adaptations in the call emission pattern of frugivorous bats when orienting under challenging conditions.

Authors:  M Jerome Beetz; Manfred Kössl; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Temporal binding of neural responses for focused attention in biosonar.

Authors:  James A Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Modeling active sensing reveals echo detection even in large groups of bats.

Authors:  Thejasvi Beleyur; Holger R Goerlitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  How greater mouse-eared bats deal with ambiguous echoic scenes.

Authors:  M L Melcón; Y Yovel; A Denzinger; H-U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Effective biosonar echo-to-clutter rejection ratio in a complex dynamic scene.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Knowles; Jonathan R Barchi; Jason E Gaudette; James A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.