Literature DB >> 18594105

Modes of failure of Osteonics constrained tripolar implants: a retrospective analysis of forty-three failed implants.

Olivier Guyen1, David G Lewallen, Miguel E Cabanela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Osteonics constrained tripolar implant has been one of the most commonly used options to manage recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty. Mechanical failures were expected and have been reported. The purpose of this retrospective review was to identify the observed modes of failure of this device.
METHODS: Forty-three failed Osteonics constrained tripolar implants were revised at our institution between September 1997 and April 2005. All revisions related to the constrained acetabular component only were considered as failures. All of the devices had been inserted for recurrent or intraoperative instability during revision procedures. Seven different methods of implantation were used. Operative reports and radiographs were reviewed to identify the modes of failure.
RESULTS: The average time to failure of the forty-three implants was 28.4 months. A total of five modes of failure were observed: failure at the bone-implant interface (type I), which occurred in eleven hips; failure at the mechanisms holding the constrained liner to the metal shell (type II), in six hips; failure of the retaining mechanism of the bipolar component (type III), in ten hips; dislocation of the prosthetic head at the inner bearing of the bipolar component (type IV), in three hips; and infection (type V), in twelve hips. The mode of failure remained unknown in one hip that had been revised at another institution.
CONCLUSIONS: The Osteonics constrained tripolar total hip arthroplasty implant is a complex device involving many parts. We showed that failure of this device can occur at most of its interfaces. It would therefore appear logical to limit its application to salvage situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18594105     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

1.  Constrained cups appear incapable of meeting the demands of revision THA.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Salim K Durrani; Molly M Usrey; Kenneth B Mathis; Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research perspectives for pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Use of a dual mobility socket to manage total hip arthroplasty instability.

Authors:  Olivier Guyen; Vincent Pibarot; Gualter Vaz; Christophe Chevillotte; Jacques Béjui-Hugues
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are abductor muscle quality and previous revision surgery predictors of constrained liner failure in hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Loi'y H Mustafa; Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; Alexander Wall; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  CORR Insights(®): Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THA.

Authors:  Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Mickael Ropars; Camille Rodaix; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher; David Biau; Jean Pierre Courpied; Denis Huten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Graham D Pallante; Michael J Taunton; Rafael J Sierra; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular liner with focal constraint to prevent dislocation after THA.

Authors:  Jacob T Munro; Mihai H Vioreanu; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.