Literature DB >> 26687124

Effect of pure muscle retraction on multifidus injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery with 24 weeks observation in a rabbit model.

Zhi-Jun Hu1,2, Jian-Feng Zhang1,2, Wen-Bin Xu1,2, Feng-Dong Zhao1,2, Ji-Ying Wang2, Shun-Wu Fan3,4, Xiang-Qian Fang5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of pure muscle retraction on multifidus injury and atrophy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three adult New Zealand white rabbits were divided evenly into three groups: 1-h retraction (group R1), 2-h retraction (R2), and sham surgery (C). The multifidus muscle was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology after 3 and 48 h, and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: Multifidus muscle injury and atrophy were not observed in group C, but were obvious in groups R1 and R2. Edema, necrosis, and inflammation mainly occurred in the first week postoperatively, and were more severe in R2 than in R1 (P < 0.01). Muscle fiber regeneration began at week 1, fibrotic changes mainly occurred at weeks 3 and 6, and fat degeneration became obvious at weeks 12 and 24 postoperatively. The fibrosis and fat degeneration scores of R2 were higher than those of R1 (P < 0.01). Decreased acetylcholine activity and granular degeneration of the neuromuscular junction were observed in both retraction groups, but was more severe in R2 than in R1 (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Muscle retraction was an important factor not only for multifidus injury, but also for long-term multifidus atrophy after posterior lumbar surgery; a longer retraction time caused more severe multifidus injury and atrophy. Muscle fibers can be regenerated postoperatively, and denervation might be the reason for muscle atrophy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrophy; Injury; Multifidus muscle; Posterior lumbar spine surgery; Pure retraction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26687124     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4247-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery.

Authors:  Heath Taylor; Alison H McGregor; Siroos Medhi-Zadeh; Simon Richards; Nostrat Kahn; Jamshied Alaghband Zadeh; Sean P F Hughes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Poloxamer-188 reduces muscular edema after tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Thomas J Walters; Vincent J Mase; Janet L Roe; Michael A Dubick; Robert J Christy
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-05

3.  Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Ji-Ying Wang; Feng-Dong Zhao; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery.

Authors:  Y Kawaguchi; S Yabuki; J Styf; K Olmarker; B Rydevik; H Matsui; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A preliminary examination of cryotherapy and secondary injury in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Merrick; J M Rankin; F A Andres; C L Hinman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  R Gejo; H Matsui; Y Kawaguchi; H Ishihara; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies.

Authors:  Kathryn J Stevens; David B Spenciner; Karen L Griffiths; Kee D Kim; Marike Zwienenberg-Lee; Todd Alamin; Roland Bammer
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-04

Review 8.  The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review.

Authors:  Michael D Freeman; Mark A Woodham; Andrew W Woodham
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction.

Authors:  Kadir Kotil; Tamer Tunckale; Zeynep Tatar; Macit Koldas; Alev Kural; Turgay Bilge
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-02

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats.

Authors:  R Gejo; Y Kawaguchi; T Kondoh; E Tabuchi; H Matsui; K Torii; T Ono; T Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single segmental lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimum two-year follow up.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Zhi-Chao Hu; Xiao-Bin Li; Zhen-Hua Feng; Dong Chen; Hui Xu; Qi-Shan Huang; Yan Lin; Xiang-Yang Wang; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

2.  A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly.

Authors:  Yifan Huang; Jian Chen; Peng Gao; Changjiang Gu; Jin Fan; Zhiyi Hu; Xiaojian Cao; Guoyong Yin; Wei Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.