Literature DB >> 33557804

A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly.

Yifan Huang1, Jian Chen1, Peng Gao1, Changjiang Gu1, Jin Fan1, Zhiyi Hu1, Xiaojian Cao1, Guoyong Yin2, Wei Zhou3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is an effective surgical approach for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. However, no studies of prognosis, especially the recovery of the soft tissue, have reported using BDUA in an elderly population. The aims of these research were to investigate the early efficacy of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the patients over 65 years of age, especially in the perioperative factors and the recovery of the soft tissue.
METHODS: The clinical data from 61 aging patients with lumbar degenerative disease who received surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. 31 cases who received the lumbar interbody fusion surgery with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) were compared with 30 cases who received conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The radiographic parameters were measured using X-ray including lumbar lordosis angle and fusion rate. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at different time points. Fatty degeneration ratio and area of muscle/vertebral body were used to detect recovery of soft tissue.
RESULTS: The BDUA approach group was found to have significantly less intraoperative blood loss(p < 0.05) and postoperative drainage(p < 0.05) compared to conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group. Symptoms of spinal canal stenosis and nerve compression were significantly relieved postoperatively, as compared with the preoperative state. However, the opposite side had a lower rate of fatty degeneration (9.42 ± 3.17%) comparing to decompression side (11.68 ± 3.08%) (P < 0.05) six months after surgery in the BDUA group. While there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in two sides of conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion approach group six months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach (BDUA) is able to reduce the intraoperative and postoperative body fluid loss in the elderly. The opposite side of decompression in BDUA shows less fatty degeneration in 6 months, which indicates better recovery of the soft tissue of the aging patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral decompression via unilateral approach; Fatty degeneration; Lumbar degenerative disease

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33557804      PMCID: PMC7871543          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04026-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  36 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Langston T Holly; James D Schwender
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.

Authors:  Markus F Oertel; Yu-Mi Ryang; Marcus C Korinth; Joachim M Gilsbach; Veit Rohde
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  The Effect of Lumbar Spinal Muscle on Spinal Sagittal Alignment: Evaluating Muscle Quantity and Quality.

Authors:  Hyo Sub Jun; Ji Hee Kim; Jun Hyong Ahn; In Bok Chang; Joon Ho Song; Tae Hwan Kim; Moon Soo Park; Yong Chan Kim; Seok Woo Kim; Jae Keun Oh; Do Heum Yoon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine.

Authors:  L L Wiltse
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Harms; H Rolinger
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1982 May-Jun

7.  Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  X Z Jiang; W Tian; B Liu; Q Li; G L Zhang; L Hu; Zy Li; D He
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 8.  Paraspinal Muscles of Patients with Lumbar Diseases.

Authors:  Moon Soo Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Tae-Hwan Kim; JaeKeun Oh; Seon-Jong Lee; Ho Guen Chang; Jae-Hyuk Shin
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.268

9.  Fatty degeneration of multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bahar Yanik; Bahri Keyik; Isik Conkbayir
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The measurement of adult blood pressure and management of hypertension before elective surgery: Joint Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  A Hartle; T McCormack; J Carlisle; S Anderson; A Pichel; N Beckett; T Woodcock; A Heagerty
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 6.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.