Literature DB >> 17330578

Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle: a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction.

Kadir Kotil1, Tamer Tunckale, Zeynep Tatar, Macit Koldas, Alev Kural, Turgay Bilge.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to determine the extent of muscle injury caused by continuous or intermittent muscle retraction during macro- and microdiscectomy in lumbar disc surgery. Pain scores, serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels, and histological findings obtained in muscle specimens were compared.
METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent surgery for a one-level disc herniation during a 1-year period (January 2004-January 2005) and who had similar demographic characteristics were randomly assigned to one of four groups, each consisting of 15 patients: Group A, microdiscectomy in which the retractor was never released; Group B, microdiscectomy in which the retractor was released every 15 minutes; Group C, macrodiscectomy in which the retractor was never released; and Group D, macrodiscectomy in which the retractor was released every 15 minutes. Muscle biopsy samples were acquired in each group, and biochemical studies were conducted to determine serum CPK levels. The duration of muscle retraction was 15 minutes followed by 3 minutes of relaxation in Groups B and D. In all groups, muscle degeneration and elevation in serum CPK levels were observed immediately after surgery. The overall results, however, were different. The decline of serum CPK levels started 1 week after surgery. The smallest degree of muscle injury (reflected by the lowest serum CPK level) was observed in Group B. When the pre- and postoperative CPK values were compared in all groups, the patients in Groups B and D reported the least amount of back pain (p < 0.001). No significant differences in serum CPK levels were observed between Groups A and C or between Groups B and D. The extent of back pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale, and the consumption of analgesics was also assessed. The groups exhibited significantly different responses: the lowest analgesic consumption and the lowest pain scores were demonstrated in Groups B and D.
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, the authors determined that muscle injury during lumbar disc surgery was closely related to muscle retraction and relaxation times whereas the size of the paravertebral skin incision had no effect on postoperative back pain and disability. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of back pain during the long-term follow-up period (18-19 months).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17330578     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.2.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  16 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Comparison of a minimally invasive procedure versus standard microscopic discotomy: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jörg Franke; R Greiner-Perth; H Boehm; K Mahlfeld; H Grasshoff; Y Allam; F Awiszus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Changes in serum and exudate creatine phosphokinase concentrations as an indicator of deep tissue injury: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yunita Sari; Gojiro Nakagami; Ai Kinoshita; Lijuan Huang; Kohei Ueda; Shinji Iizaka; Hiromi Sanada; Junko Sugama
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Mechanical factors and vitamin D deficiency in schoolchildren with low back pain: biochemical and cross-sectional survey analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad H Alghadir; Sami A Gabr; Einas S Al-Eisa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Anatomical research on strength of screw track fixation in novel cortical bone trajectory for osteoporosis lumbar spine.

Authors:  Paerhati Rexiti; Gulixian Aierken; Shuiquan Wang; Tuerhongjiang Abudurexiti; Nueraihemaiti Abuduwali; Qiang Deng; Hailong Guo; Weibin Sheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-17

7.  Effect of pure muscle retraction on multifidus injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery with 24 weeks observation in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Jian-Feng Zhang; Wen-Bin Xu; Feng-Dong Zhao; Ji-Ying Wang; Shun-Wu Fan; Xiang-Qian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Beom-Seok Park; Young-Joon Kwon; Yu-Sam Won; Hyun-Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

9.  Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Yonghao Tian; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-04

10.  Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark Arts; Ronald Brand; Bas van der Kallen; Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt; Wilco Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.