Literature DB >> 10332796

Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery.

R Gejo1, H Matsui, Y Kawaguchi, H Ishihara, H Tsuji.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Serial changes in trunk muscle performance were prospectively studied in 20 patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of back muscle injury on postoperative trunk muscle performance and low back pain, to clarify the significance of minimization of back muscle injury during surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The current investigators have reported examination of iatrogenic back muscle injury in an animal model and in humans. However, definite impairment caused by such back muscle injury has not been clarified.
METHODS: The patients were divided into a short-retraction-time group (< 80 minutes; n = 12) and a long-retraction-time group (> or = 80 minutes; n = 8). Before surgery and 3 and 6 months after surgery, the degree of back muscle injury was estimated by magnetic resonance imaging, and trunk muscle strength was measured. In addition, the incidence and severity of low back pain were serially analyzed.
RESULTS: Back muscle injury was directly related to the muscle retraction time during surgery. The damage to the multifidus muscle was more severe, and the recovery of extensor muscle strength was delayed in the long-retraction-time group. In addition, the incidence of postoperative low back pain was significantly higher in the long-retraction-time group.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative trunk muscle performance is dependent on the muscle retraction time. Thus, it is beneficial to shorten the retraction time to minimize back muscle injury and subsequent postoperative low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10332796     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  86 in total

1.  Volume and fat infiltration of spino-pelvic musculature in adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Nicolas Bronsard; José G Raya; Jean Marc Vital; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Wale A R Sulaiman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

3.  A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Louise White; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimal-invasive stabilization and circumferential spinal cord decompression in metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC).

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Reginald Knight; Jörg Beyerlein; Roland Gessler; Lothar Wiesner; Christian Schaefer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of the cross-sectional area of the muscle contractile and non-contractile components.

Authors:  Olivier Gille; Mathieu-Panchoa de Sèze; Patrick Guérin; Erwan Jolivet; Jean-Marc Vital; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Jong G Park; Ankit I Mehta; Tony Shan; Peter M Grossi; Christopher R Brown; William J Richardson; Robert E Isaacs; Carlos A Bagley; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Oren N Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Spinal cord modularity: evolution, development, and optimization and the possible relevance to low back pain in man.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Corey B Hart; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.