Literature DB >> 12486343

The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery.

Heath Taylor1, Alison H McGregor, Siroos Medhi-Zadeh, Simon Richards, Nostrat Kahn, Jamshied Alaghband Zadeh, Sean P F Hughes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective pilot study examining pre-, intra- and postoperative measures.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of muscle retractors on the posterior spinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have identified changes in the structure and function of the back extensor mechanism as a result of low back pain. However, the effect of surgery on the functioning of these muscles, particularly surgical retraction, has received less attention.
METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery were recruited into this study, and recordings of intramuscular pressure during surgery were performed using a pressure-monitoring system before insertion of retractors, 5, 30, and 60 minutes into surgery, and on removal of retractors. Before and following use of the retractors, muscle biopsies were taken from the multifidus muscle for analysis using birefringence techniques.
RESULTS: A significant increase in intramuscular pressure (P < 0.001) was observed during surgery. On removal of retractors, this pressure returned to or near to the original value. Analysis of muscle biopsies using calcium activated adenosine triphosphatase birefringence revealed a reduction in muscle function following prolonged use of self-retaining retractors.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial rise in pressure in the erector spinae muscle during posterior spinal surgery was observed, and this appeared to be associated with marked changes in the function of the muscles. This could be an important factor in the generation of operative scar tissue and postoperative dysfunction of the spinal muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486343     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

1.  Volume and fat infiltration of spino-pelvic musculature in adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Bertrand Moal; Nicolas Bronsard; José G Raya; Jean Marc Vital; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-10-18

2.  Lateral transmuscular or combined interlaminar/paraisthmic approach to lateral lumbar disc herniation? A comparative clinical series of 48 patients.

Authors:  Y M Ryang; I Rohde; A Ince; M F Oertel; J M Gilsbach; V Rohde
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Intraoperative measurement of pharynx/esophagus retraction during anterior cervical surgery. Part I: pressure.

Authors:  Oliver Heese; Frank Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach and the conventional posterior open approach for thoracolumbar fractures, using MRI, histological and electrophysiological analyses of the multifidus muscle.

Authors:  Liu Junhui; Pang Zhengbao; Xu Wenbin; Hao Lu; Li Shengyun; Fan Shunwu; Zhao Fengdong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression.

Authors:  A H McGregor; A K Burton; P Sell; G Waddell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-17

8.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

9.  Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Tague M Thorson; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; C J Doré; T P Morris; S Morris; K Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.