Literature DB >> 10767806

Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats.

R Gejo1, Y Kawaguchi, T Kondoh, E Tabuchi, H Matsui, K Torii, T Ono, T Kimura.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Postoperative back muscle injury was evaluated in rats by magnetic resonance imaging and histologic analyses.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the magnetic resonance imaging manifestation of back muscle injury with the histologic findings in rats and to subsequently clarify the histopathologic appearance of the high intensity regions on T2-weighted images in human postoperative back muscles. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In a previous study, it was found that the signal intensity on T2-weighted images of the postoperative back muscles was increased in patients who had postsurgical lumbar muscle impairment, especially in those with a prolonged surgery duration. However, the specific histopathologic changes that cause the high signal intensity on T2-weighted images remain unclear.
METHODS: Rats were divided into three groups: sham operation group, 1-hour retraction group, and 2-hour retraction group. Magnetic resonance imaging and histology of the multifidus muscles were examined before surgery and at 2, 7, and 21 days after surgery.
RESULTS: T2-weighted imaging was more useful than T1-weighted imaging to estimate back muscle injury. The high signal intensity of the multifidus muscles on T2-weighted images remained 21 days after surgery only in the 2-hour retraction group. Histologically, the regeneration of the multifidus muscles was complete at 21 days after surgery in the 1-hour retraction group, but the regenerated muscle fibers in the 2-hour retraction group had a small diameter, and the extracellular fluid space remained large.
CONCLUSION: The high signal intensity on T2-weighted images of the postoperative multifidus muscles in the regenerative phase may be due to an increased extracellular space and incomplete muscle fiber regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10767806     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  A survey of post-operative management for patients following first time lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Esther Williamson; Louise White; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-17

3.  Effect of pure muscle retraction on multifidus injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery with 24 weeks observation in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Jian-Feng Zhang; Wen-Bin Xu; Feng-Dong Zhao; Ji-Ying Wang; Shun-Wu Fan; Xiang-Qian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Less invasive and less technically demanding decompressive procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis--appropriate for general orthopaedic surgeons?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Takamitsu Okada; Kensuke Fukushima; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Hiroyuki Sakagami; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Toshiaki Kotani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Applied anatomy of a minimally invasive muscle-splitting approach to posterior C1-C2 fusion: an anatomical feasibility study.

Authors:  Gergely Bodon; Lajos Patonay; Gabor Baksa; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Outcomes of posterior facet versus pedicle screw fixation of circumferential fusion: a cohort study.

Authors:  Glenn R Buttermann; Tague M Thorson; William J Mullin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Microdialysis of paraspinal muscle in healthy volunteers and patients underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Gang Ren; Søren Eiskjaer; Jon Kaspersen; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Single incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Han; Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong-Jun Cho; Tack Geun Cho
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-06-30

9.  Biomechanical characteristics of an integrated lumbar interbody fusion device.

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Georgios Vastardis; Julia Zelenakova; Gerard Carandang; Robert M Havey; Erik I Waldorff; Michael R Zindrick; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 10.  Potential Role of MRI Imaging for Myofascial Pain: A Scoping Review for the Clinicians and Theoretical Considerations.

Authors:  Valerie Evans; Michael Behr; Anshika Gangwar; Michael D Noseworthy; Dinesh Kumbhare
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.