BACKGROUND: Seafood is the main source of organic arsenic exposure (arsenobetaine, arsenosugars and arsenolipids) in the population. Arsenosugars and arsenolipids are metabolized to several species including dimethylarsinate (DMA). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association of seafood intake with spot urine arsenic concentrations in the 2003-2006 National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We studied 4276 participants ≥ 6 years. Total arsenic was measured using inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (ICPMS). Urine DMA and arsenobetaine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ICPMS. RESULTS: Participants reporting seafood in the past 24-h had higher urine concentrations of total arsenic (median 24.5 vs. 7.3 μg/L), DMA (6.0 vs. 3.5 μg/L), arsenobetaine (10.2 vs. 0.9 μg/L) and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine (11.0 vs. 5.5 μg/L). Participants reporting seafood ≥ 2/wk vs. never during the past year had 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.9, 2.7), 1.4 (1.2, 1.6), 6.0 (4.6, 7.8) and 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) times higher (p-trend <0.001) concentrations of total arsenic, DMA, arsenobetaine and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine, respectively. In participants without detectable arsenobetaine and in analyses adjusted for arsenobetaine, seafood consumption in the past year was not associated with total arsenic or DMA concentrations in urine. CONCLUSION: Seafood intake was a major determinant of increased urine concentrations of total arsenic, DMA, arsenobetaine and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine in the US population. Epidemiologic studies that use total arsenic, DMA, the sum of inorganic arsenic, methylarsonate and DMA, and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine as markers of inorganic arsenic exposure and/or metabolism need to address seafood intake. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Seafood is the main source of organic arsenic exposure (arsenobetaine, arsenosugars and arsenolipids) in the population. Arsenosugars and arsenolipids are metabolized to several species including dimethylarsinate (DMA). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association of seafood intake with spot urine arsenic concentrations in the 2003-2006 National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We studied 4276 participants ≥ 6 years. Total arsenic was measured using inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (ICPMS). Urine DMA and arsenobetaine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ICPMS. RESULTS:Participants reporting seafood in the past 24-h had higher urine concentrations of total arsenic (median 24.5 vs. 7.3 μg/L), DMA (6.0 vs. 3.5 μg/L), arsenobetaine (10.2 vs. 0.9 μg/L) and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine (11.0 vs. 5.5 μg/L). Participants reporting seafood ≥ 2/wk vs. never during the past year had 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.9, 2.7), 1.4 (1.2, 1.6), 6.0 (4.6, 7.8) and 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) times higher (p-trend <0.001) concentrations of total arsenic, DMA, arsenobetaine and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine, respectively. In participants without detectable arsenobetaine and in analyses adjusted for arsenobetaine, seafood consumption in the past year was not associated with total arsenic or DMA concentrations in urine. CONCLUSION: Seafood intake was a major determinant of increased urine concentrations of total arsenic, DMA, arsenobetaine and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine in the US population. Epidemiologic studies that use total arsenic, DMA, the sum of inorganic arsenic, methylarsonate and DMA, and total arsenic minus arsenobetaine as markers of inorganic arsenic exposure and/or metabolism need to address seafood intake. Copyright Â
Authors: A F Subar; F E Thompson; V Kipnis; D Midthune; P Hurwitz; S McNutt; A McIntosh; S Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M Styblo; L M Del Razo; L Vega; D R Germolec; E L LeCluyse; G A Hamilton; W Reed; C Wang; W R Cullen; D J Thomas Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Yu Mei Hsueh; Miao Kan Hsu; Hung Yi Chiou; Mo Hsiung Yang; Chuan Chieh Huang; Chien Jen Chen Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2002-07-07 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Jesus Vioque; Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz; Manus Carey; Manoli García de la Hera; Jordi Sunyer; Maribel Casas; Isolina Riaño-Galán; Adonina Tardón; Sabrina Llop; Rubén Amorós; Pilar Amiano; José R Bilbao; Margaret R Karagas; Andrew A Meharg Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Katherine A Moon; Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Jason G Umans; Lyle G Best; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-05-26 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Xin Wang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stuart Batterman; Siobán D Harlow; Sung Kyun Park Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem; Elena Colicino; Aaron J Specht; Xu Gao; Cuicui Wang; Pantel Vokonas; Marc G Weisskopf; Edward W Boyer; Andrea A Baccarelli; Joel Schwartz Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kefeng Yang; Pengcheng Xun; Mercedes Carnethon; April P Carson; Liping Lu; Jie Zhu; Ka He Journal: Environ Res Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Maria Grau-Perez; Ana Navas-Acien; Inmaculada Galan-Chilet; Laisa S Briongos-Figuero; David Morchon-Simon; Jose D Bermudez; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Griselda de Marco; Pilar Rentero-Garrido; Tamara Garcia-Barrera; Jose L Gomez-Ariza; Jose A Casasnovas; Juan C Martin-Escudero; Josep Redon; F Javier Chaves; Maria Tellez-Plaza Journal: Environ Pollut Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 8.071
Authors: Matthew O Gribble; Barbara V Howard; Jason G Umans; Nawar M Shara; Kevin A Francesconi; Walter Goessler; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Ellen K Silbergeld; Eliseo Guallar; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Gonzalo G Garcia-Vargas; Stephen J Rothenberg; Ellen K Silbergeld; Virginia Weaver; Rachel Zamoiski; Carol Resnick; Marisela Rubio-Andrade; Patrick J Parsons; Amy J Steuerwald; Ana Navas-Acién; Eliseo Guallar Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 5.563