Literature DB >> 26659063

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Stavros Sfoungaristos1, Ofer N Gofrit2, Dov Pode2, Ezekiel H Landau2, Mordechai Duvdevani2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify independent predictors for postoperative stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for staghorn stones and to compare Guy's, CROES and STONE nomograms regarding their predictive ability and accuracy specifically for staghorn stones.
METHODS: Data of 286 patients who underwent PCNL in our department were collected and analyzed. Several parameters, including the three nomograms, were analyzed to reveal independent predictors for postoperative stone-free status. The area under the curve was used to assess the predictive ability of the independent predictors.
RESULTS: A total of 73 staghorn calculi were identified with mean stone burden of 1253.5 mm(2). Mean Guy's, CROES and STONE score was 3.34, 125.8 and 9.95, respectively. Postoperative stone-free rate was 65.8 %. In univariate analysis, all three nomograms were significantly associated with stone-free status. However, STONE was the only significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. STONE also revealed the highest predictive accuracy compared to Guy's and CROES nomogram.
CONCLUSIONS: STONE nephrolithometry was found to be the only predictor for stone-free rate after PCNL for staghorn stones compared to Guy's and CROES nomograms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CROES; Guy’s stone score; Nomogram; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; STONE; Stone-free

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26659063     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1743-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

1.  Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret S Pearle; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome.

Authors:  Arash Akhavein; Carl Henriksen; Jamil Syed; Vincent G Bird
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Evaluation and comparison of urolithiasis scoring systems used in percutaneous kidney stone surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Labadie; Zhamshid Okhunov; Arash Akhavein; Daniel M Moreira; Jorge Moreno-Palacios; Michael Del Junco; Zeph Okeke; Vincent Bird; Arthur D Smith; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Joaquim F A Claro; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Dedan Opondo; Stavros Gravas; Andrian Joyce; Margaret Pearle; Tadashi Matsuda; Ying-Hao Sun; Dean Assimos; John Denstedt; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Surgical classification of renal calculi.

Authors:  F Rocco; A Mandressi; P Larcher
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Authors:  Zhamshid Okhunov; Justin I Friedlander; Arvin K George; Brian D Duty; Daniel M Moreira; Arun K Srinivasan; Joel Hillelsohn; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Antonello De Lisa; Burak Turna; Jorge Rioja; Helena Walfridsson; Alessandro D'Addessi; Carson Wong; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Annika Andersson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Multimodal treatment (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease.

Authors:  J Rassweiler; R Gumpinger; K Miller; F Hölzermann; F Eisenberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters.

Authors:  Sae Woong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Do the urolithiasis scoring systems predict the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in cases with anatomical abnormalities?

Authors:  Ramazan Kocaaslan; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Mehmet Mazhar Utangac; Tolga Karakan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Ali Unsal; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Preoperative imaging in staghorn calculi, planning and decision making in management of staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Ilan Klein; Jorge Gutiérrez-Aceves
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-07-06

6.  Comparison of Scoring Systems in Predicting Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Authors:  Muzaffer Akçay; Muhammed Tosun; Fatih Gevher; Senad Kalkan; Cevper Ersöz; Yunus Kayalı; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.021

Review 7.  Staghorn renal stones: what the urologist needs to know.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.