Literature DB >> 27406175

Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters.

Sae Woong Choi1, Woong Jin Bae1, U-Syn Ha1, Sung-Hoo Hong1, Ji Youl Lee1, Sae Woong Kim1, Hyuk Jin Cho2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors predictive of surgical outcomes of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPCNL) and to compare the predictability and accuracy of the Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and CROES nomogram. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the surgical outcomes recorded consecutively and imaging data of preoperative computed tomography scans of 141 patients who had undergone TPCNL from June 2012 to October 2015. Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES stone-scoring systems (SSSs) and other prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses.
RESULTS: The initial stone-free and complication rates after TPCNL were 78.7 (111/141) and 17.0 % (24/141). On univariate analysis, all three scoring systems were identified as significant factors in terms of stone-free rate (SFR). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Guy's stone score and stone burden ≥385 mm2 had significant correlations with stone-free status [odds ratios (OR) = 3.220, p = 0.001 and OR = 6.451, p = 0.002, respectively]. Guy's stone score (OR = 1.879, p = 0.013) was an independent risk factor for the development of complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES SSSs and stone burden showed good results (0.821, 0.816, 0.820, and 0.800, respectively). Pairwise comparison of ROC curves showed that there was no significant difference between each final score and stone burden.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the three scoring systems, Guy's stone score was the only significant predictive factor for SFR and complication rates after TPCNL in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Stone burden was significantly associated with a postoperative stone-free status (SFS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CROES nomogram; Guy’s stone score; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27406175     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1891-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

1.  Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Muzaffer Akcay; Erdem Tekinarslan; Cem Kezer; Faruk Ozgor; Mahir Seyrek; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome.

Authors:  Arash Akhavein; Carl Henriksen; Jamil Syed; Vincent G Bird
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Utility of the Guy's stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Joaquim F A Claro; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Evaluation of stone-free rate using Guy's Stone Score and assessment of complications using modified Clavien grading system for percutaneous nephro-lithotomy.

Authors:  Rajan Kumar Sinha; Subhabrata Mukherjee; Tarun Jindal; Pramod Kumar Sharma; Barun Saha; Nilanjan Mitra; Jay Kumar; Chandranath Mukhopadhyay; Nabankur Ghosh; Mir Reza Kamal; Soumendra Nath Mandal; Dilip Karmakar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study.

Authors:  Wei Xue; Dalibor Pacik; Willem Boellaard; Alberto Breda; Mircea Botoca; Jens Rassweiler; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  G C Bellman; R Davidoff; J Candela; J Gerspach; S Kurtz; L Stout
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Annika Andersson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; T A Coury; D M Newman; R J Kahnoski; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Kadir Tepeler; Aytul Tas; Sabahattin Aydin; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The evaluation of early predictive factors for urosepsis in patients with negative preoperative urine culture following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Zewu Zhu; Yu Cui; Huimin Zeng; Yongchao Li; Feng Zeng; Yang Li; Zhiyong Chen; Chen Hequn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Erica Huang; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.