Literature DB >> 23540858

S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Zhamshid Okhunov1, Justin I Friedlander, Arvin K George, Brian D Duty, Daniel M Moreira, Arun K Srinivasan, Joel Hillelsohn, Arthur D Smith, Zeph Okeke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To, first, propose a novel scoring system to standardize reporting for percutaneous nephrolithotomy because the instruments currently available to predict the percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes are cumbersome, not validated, and of limited clinical utility; and, second, assess and predict the stone-free rates and perioperative parameters applying S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five reproducible variables available from preoperative noncontrast-enhanced computed tomography were measured: stone size (S), tract length (T), obstruction (O), number of involved calices (N), and essence or stone density (E).
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included. The mean score was 7.7 (range 4-11). The stone-free rate after the first procedure was 80%. There were 18 complications (21%). The most frequent complications were postoperative sepsis and bleeding. The S.T.O.N.E. score correlated with the postoperative stone-free status (P = .001). The patients rendered stone free had statistically significant lower scores than the patients with residual stones (6.8 vs 9.7, P = .002). Additionally, the score correlated with the estimated blood loss (P = .005), operative time (P = .001), and length of hospital stay (P = .001).
CONCLUSION: The novel scoring system we have presented was found to predict treatment success and the risk of perioperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Reproducible, standardized parameters obtained from computed tomography imaging can be used for preoperative patient counseling, surgical planning, and evaluation of surgical outcomes across institutions and within medical studies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23540858     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  63 in total

1.  External validation of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system: How valid is it?

Authors:  Thomas Tailly; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Authors:  Faruk Özgör; Onur Küçüktopcu; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; Ömer Sarılar; Murat Binbay; Gökhan Gürbüz
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

4.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

6.  External validation of Resorlu-Unsal stone score as predictor of outcomes after retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Ezekiel H Landau; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  The application of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry in pediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Shan Doulian; Shayitaji Hasimu; Da Jun; Wang Lingling; Zhou Tuo; Abudukeyoumu Yusufu; Xu Mingxi; Lu Mujun
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Which is better? Guy's versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Evaluation of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system as a predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Hasan Anıl Atalay; Lutfi Canat; Recep Bayraktarlı; Ilter Alkan; Osman Can; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.