Literature DB >> 24571713

Standardization of patient outcomes reporting in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Dedan Opondo1, Stavros Gravas, Andrian Joyce, Margaret Pearle, Tadashi Matsuda, Ying-Hao Sun, Dean Assimos, John Denstedt, Jean de la Rosette.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There exist no global standards for defining patient outcomes in renal stone surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of reporting of outcomes in studies investigating percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to propose standardized consensus definitions for common outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a literature search in PubMed for randomized controlled studies that investigated PCNL between 2002 and 2012. All outcomes reported were analyzed for each study. Each article was examined to identify the definition of each reported patient outcome. Various aspects of patient outcomes were presented to a panel of 85 experts in a Delphi process consisting of three rounds. The experts were asked to select options that they believed would best describe each outcome. Finally, we composed recommendations for definition of the most common outcomes reported in PCNL studies.
RESULTS: Eighty-three RCTs were included in the review of patient outcomes. Stone-free rate (55, 63.9%), length of stay (47, 56.6%), complication rate (44, 53.0%), and changes in hemoglobin (40, 48.2%) were the most frequently reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials of PCNL. Only 24/53 (45.3%) studies had a formal definition of stone-free status. Only 31/40 (77.5%) studies, which reported change in hemoglobin, had a unit of measurement; however, 22/40 (55.0%) did not report the timing of postoperative hemoglobin measurement. A set of recommendations for defining patient outcomes in PCNL is presented for the 15 most commonly reported outcomes in PCNL.
CONCLUSIONS: Wide variations and underspecification exist in the definition and reporting of outcomes in PCNL. We propose recommendations for the definition of outcomes based on a review of the literature and expert opinion. Standardization of outcome definition and reporting will improve the quality of urologic research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571713     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  26 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications based on ASA risks in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Hüseyin Buğra Karakaş; İzzet Çiçekbilek; Adem Tok; Tamer Alışkan; Bülent Akduman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

3.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

4.  Recurrent waist tumor subsequent to percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A case report.

Authors:  Shusuan Jiang; Sulai Liu; Pingping Tan; Tieyong Song; Y U Xie; Fuhua Zeng; Zhizhong Liu; Weiqing Han; Zengnan Mo; Lin Qi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Predictors of clinical outcome after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculus.

Authors:  Zhao-Lun Li; Qian Deng; Tie Chong; Peng Zhang; He-Cheng Li; Hong-Liang Li; Hai-Wen Chen; Wei-Min Gan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Which is better? Guy's versus S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yasser A Noureldin; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Sero Andonian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm.

Authors:  Konrad Wilhelm; Simon Hein; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  [Urolithiasis in children: medical and surgical treatment strategies].

Authors:  Konrad Wilhelm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Outcome-Based Comparison of Percutaneous Procedures for Urinary Lithiasis with Calibre of Instrumentation less than 12Fr.

Authors:  H Wells; N Rukin; A Wright; B K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.