Literature DB >> 25530366

Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome.

Arash Akhavein1, Carl Henriksen1, Jamil Syed1, Vincent G Bird2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy using computerized tomography (CT) imaging with strict criteria for stone clearance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 122 patients who consecutively underwent primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy from July 2010 to March 2012 at our university-based referral hospital. All patients routinely have preoperative and postoperative CT imaging for stone burden determination. Primary outcome (residual stone) was scored as 0-2, 3-4, and >4 mm. All S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry parameters were recorded and scored as per published definition. The t test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square testing or the Fisher exact test (when counts were small) was used for categorical covariates. S.T.O.N.E. score correlation with stone-free status was analyzed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Nephrolithometry score ranged from 5 to 13 with a mean of 9.5. Postoperative CT for residual stone showed 67 (54.9%), 26 (21.3%), and 29 (23.8%) patients had 0-2, 3-4, and >4 mm residual stone, respectively. Mean nephrolithometry scores for residual stone of 0-2, 3-4, and >4 mm were 8.87, 9.73, and 10.79 respectively (P <.0001). There were 11 (9.8%) complications.
CONCLUSION: With use of strict CT imaging criteria for assessment of residual stone status, the S.T.O.N.E. scoring system is reproducible and predictive of treatment success. Further investigation is required to both validate this model and to determine if other predictive parameters will improve it as a predictive model.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25530366     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones: Which nomogram can better predict postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Best of the 2013 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights From the 2013 American Urological Association Meeting, May 4-8, 2013, San Diego, CA.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Dean Assimos; Michael B Chancellor; J Curtis Nickel; Michael K Brawer; Adam J M Kern; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

3.  Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Zhamshid Okhunov; Piruz Motamedinia; Vincent Bird; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

4.  The application of S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry in pediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculi treated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Shan Doulian; Shayitaji Hasimu; Da Jun; Wang Lingling; Zhou Tuo; Abudukeyoumu Yusufu; Xu Mingxi; Lu Mujun
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Prediction of stone-free status and complication rates after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative and retrospective study using three stone-scoring systems and preoperative parameters.

Authors:  Sae Woong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Erica Huang; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.