Fabio C Vicentini1, Giovanni Scala Marchini2, Eduardo Mazzucchi2, Joaquim F A Claro3, Miguel Srougi2. 1. Section of Endourology, Division of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Section of Endourology, Division of Urology, Men's Health Centre, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: fabio@drfabiovicentini.com.br. 2. Section of Endourology, Division of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 3. Section of Endourology, Division of Urology, Men's Health Centre, Hospital Brigadeiro, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the Guy's stone score (GS) to predict the success rates and complications on the basis of the computed tomographic (CT) scan findings for renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, a total of 147 consecutive patients (155 renal units) who underwent PCNL in a completely supine position were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a CT scan preoperatively, and the stones were classified according to the GS. All PCNLs were analyzed to determine the association between the GS and treatment outcomes on the basis of CT findings and complications, according to the Clavien criteria. RESULTS: Of the 155 PCNLs, 27% were classified as GS1, 28.4% as GS2, 27% as GS3, and 17.6% as GS4. Only the largest diameter of the stones differed among the groups (GS1=21.4, GS2=26.5, GS3=31.4, and GS4=50.5 mm; P<.001). After stratification according to the GS, the groups differed significantly regarding their operative times (GS1=63±28.5, GS2=101.4±40.8, GS3=127.6±47.6, and GS4=153.3±56 minutes; P<.001), tubeless rates (GS1=54.8%, GS2=45.4%, GS3=28.6%, and GS4=7.4%; P<.001), blood transfusion rates (GS1=0%, GS2=2.3%, GS3=4.8%, and GS4=22.2%; P=.01), complications (GS1=4.8%, GS2=9.1%, GS3=26.2%, and GS4=44.4%; P<.001), immediate success rates (GS1=95.2%, GS2=79.5%, GS3=59.5%, and GS4=40.7%; P<.001), and number of auxiliary procedures (GS1=0.05±0.32, GS2=0.28±0.6, GS3=0.35±0.66, and GS4=0.43±0.59; P=.031). The final success rates after the auxiliary procedures were similar among the groups (GS1=97.6%, GS2=86.4%, GS3=90.5%, and GS4=74.5%; P=.19). CONCLUSION: The GS based on CT findings accurately predicted success rates and complications after PCNL for renal stones.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of the Guy's stone score (GS) to predict the success rates and complications on the basis of the computed tomographic (CT) scan findings for renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, a total of 147 consecutive patients (155 renal units) who underwent PCNL in a completely supine position were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a CT scan preoperatively, and the stones were classified according to the GS. All PCNLs were analyzed to determine the association between the GS and treatment outcomes on the basis of CT findings and complications, according to the Clavien criteria. RESULTS: Of the 155 PCNLs, 27% were classified as GS1, 28.4% as GS2, 27% as GS3, and 17.6% as GS4. Only the largest diameter of the stones differed among the groups (GS1=21.4, GS2=26.5, GS3=31.4, and GS4=50.5 mm; P<.001). After stratification according to the GS, the groups differed significantly regarding their operative times (GS1=63±28.5, GS2=101.4±40.8, GS3=127.6±47.6, and GS4=153.3±56 minutes; P<.001), tubeless rates (GS1=54.8%, GS2=45.4%, GS3=28.6%, and GS4=7.4%; P<.001), blood transfusion rates (GS1=0%, GS2=2.3%, GS3=4.8%, and GS4=22.2%; P=.01), complications (GS1=4.8%, GS2=9.1%, GS3=26.2%, and GS4=44.4%; P<.001), immediate success rates (GS1=95.2%, GS2=79.5%, GS3=59.5%, and GS4=40.7%; P<.001), and number of auxiliary procedures (GS1=0.05±0.32, GS2=0.28±0.6, GS3=0.35±0.66, and GS4=0.43±0.59; P=.031). The final success rates after the auxiliary procedures were similar among the groups (GS1=97.6%, GS2=86.4%, GS3=90.5%, and GS4=74.5%; P=.19). CONCLUSION: The GS based on CT findings accurately predicted success rates and complications after PCNL for renal stones.
Authors: Jennifer Bjazevic; Linda Nott; Philippe D Violette; Thomas Tailly; Marie Dion; John D Denstedt; Hassan Razvi Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Konrad Wilhelm; Simon Hein; Fabian Adams; Daniel Schlager; Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ramazan Kocaaslan; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Mehmet Mazhar Utangac; Tolga Karakan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Namik Kemal Hatipoglu; Ali Unsal; Kemal Sarica Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.436