Literature DB >> 26645476

The global burden of major infectious complications following prostate biopsy.

H Y Bennett1, M J Roberts1, S A R Doi2, R A Gardiner1.   

Abstract

We present a systematic review providing estimates of the overall and regional burden of infectious complications following prostate biopsy. A directly standardized prevalence estimate was used because it reflects the burden of disease more explicitly. Complications included sepsis, hospitalization, bacteraemia, bacteriuria, and acute urinary retention after biopsy. There were 165 articles, comprising 162 577 patients, included in the final analysis. Our findings demonstrate that transrectal biopsy was associated with a higher burden of hospitalization (1·1% vs. 0·9%) and sepsis (0·8% vs. 0·1%) compared to transperineal biopsy, while acute urinary retention was more prevalent after transperineal than transrectal biopsy (4·2% vs. 0·9%). The differences were statistically non-significant because of large heterogeneity across countries. We also demonstrate and discuss regional variations in complication rates, with Asian studies reporting higher rates of sepsis and hospitalization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; post-operative complications; prostate biopsy; prostatic neoplasms; transperineal; transrectal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645476      PMCID: PMC9150640          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268815002885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   4.434


  33 in total

1.  Nonjudicious dispensing of antibiotics by drug stores in Pratumthani, Thailand.

Authors:  Anucha Apisarnthanarak; Jeeraluk Tunpornchai; Korakot Tanawitt; Linda M Mundy
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  Baseline prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent infection following prostate biopsy using empirical or altered prophylaxis: A bias-adjusted meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Roberts; Deborah A Williamson; Paul Hadway; Suhail A R Doi; Robert A Gardiner; David L Paterson
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Location and pathological characteristics of cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens identified by transperineal biopsy compared to transrectal biopsy.

Authors:  Tania Hossack; Manish I Patel; Andrew Huo; Phillip Brenner; Carlo Yuen; Daniel Spernat; Jayne Mathews; Anne-Marie Haynes; Rob Sutherland; Warick del Prado; Phillip Stricker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  An updated method for risk adjustment in outcomes research.

Authors:  Suhail A R Doi; Jan J Barendregt; Chalapati Rao
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 5.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study.

Authors:  B Djavan; M Waldert; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; C Seitz; M Remzi; A Borkowski; C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Is it possible to predict sepsis, the most serious complication in prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Adnan Simsir; Erkan Kismali; Rashad Mammadov; Gurhan Gunaydin; Cag Cal
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jason Miller; Chandrasekhar Perumalla; Graeme Heap
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Increasing risk of infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: time to reassess antimicrobial prophylaxis?

Authors:  Alex Carignan; Jean-François Roussy; Véronique Lapointe; Louis Valiquette; Robert Sabbagh; Jacques Pépin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model.

Authors:  Suhail A R Doi; Jan J Barendregt; Shahjahan Khan; Lukman Thalib; Gail M Williams
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 10.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Annelies Vellekoop; Hashim U Ahmed; James Catto; Mark Emberton; Robert Nam; Derek J Rosario; Vincenzo Scattoni; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  [Prophylaxis of infectious complications following prostate biopsy].

Authors:  A Pilatz; G Lüdecke; F Wagenlehner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

3.  Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.

Authors:  Matthew J Roberts; Alastair Macdonald; Sachinka Ranasinghe; Harrison Bennett; Patrick E Teloken; Patrick Harris; David Paterson; Geoff Coughlin; Nigel Dunglison; Rachel Esler; Robert A Gardiner; Thomas Elliott; Louisa Gordon; John Yaxley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  Infectious complications of prostate biopsy: winning battles but not war.

Authors:  Okan Derin; Limírio Fonseca; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Aytekin Oto; Clare M Tempany; Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis and infection-related complications following prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Rebecca S Steinberg; Lauren Kipling; K C Biebighauser Bens; Dattatraya Patil; Mark Henry; Akanksha Mehta; Christopher Filson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  Pooled outcomes of performing freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System.

Authors:  Michael Tzeng; Spyridon P Basourakos; Hiten D Patel; Matthew J Allaway; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-06-28

8.  The effectiveness of targeted relative to empiric prophylaxis on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Scott; Patrick N Harris; Deborah A Williamson; Michael A Liss; Suhail A R Doi; Matthew J Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Topical rectal antiseptic at time of prostate biopsy: how a resident patient safety project has evolved into institutional practice.

Authors:  Rosa Park; Justin Gyorfi; Kalyan Dewan; Girish Kirimanjeswara; Joseph Y Clark; Matthew G Kaag; Kathleen Lehman; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).

Authors:  Badar M Mian; Ronald P Kaufman; Hugh A G Fisher
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.