Literature DB >> 24630305

Baseline prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent infection following prostate biopsy using empirical or altered prophylaxis: A bias-adjusted meta-analysis.

Matthew J Roberts1, Deborah A Williamson2, Paul Hadway3, Suhail A R Doi4, Robert A Gardiner5, David L Paterson6.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) is a commonly performed urological procedure. Recent studies suggest that pre-biopsy screening for fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) pathogens may be useful in reducing post-biopsy infections. We sought to determine the baseline prevalence of fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance in rectal flora and to investigate the relationship between pre-biopsy carriage of FQ-R pathogens and the risk of post-TRUSPB infection. Electronic databases were searched for related literature. Studies were assessed for methodological quality and comparable outcomes prior to meta-analysis (using quality- and random-effects models). Nine studies, representing 2541 patients, were included. The prevalence of FQ resistance was higher (20.4%, 95% CI 18.2-22.6%) in rectal cultures obtained following FQ-based prophylaxis compared with those obtained before (12.8%, 95% CI 10.7-15.0%). Overall infection rates in patients using empirical prophylaxis were higher (3.3%, 95% CI 2.6-4.2%) than in those using altered (targeted/protocol) regimens (0.3%, 95% CI 0-0.9%). Higher infection rates were seen in men with FQ-R rectal cultures (7.1%, 95% CI 4.0-10.5%) than in those with FQ-sensitive (FQ-S) rectal cultures (1.1%, 95% CI 0.5-1.8%). For every 14 men with FQ-R rectal cultures, one additional infection was observed compared with men with FQ-S rectal cultures. Prior FQ use and prior genitourinary infection were significant risk factors for FQ-R colonisation. FQ resistance in rectal flora is a significant predictor of post-TRUSPB infection and may require re-assessment of empirical antimicrobial prophylaxis methods. Altered prophylaxis based on rectal culturing prior to TRUSPB may reduce morbidity and potentially provide economic benefits to health services.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial prophylaxis; Fluoroquinolone resistance; Post-surgical complications; Prostate biopsy; Rectal culture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630305     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  26 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Kongnyuy; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Antibacterial Prophylaxis for Surgical Site Infection in the Elderly: Practical Application.

Authors:  Maria Adriana Cataldo; Guido Granata; Nicola Petrosillo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Povidone-iodine rectal cleansing and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy are associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

Authors:  Ji Won Ryu; Seung Il Jung; Ji Hoon Ahn; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park; Jin Woong Kim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Rapid Identification of Rectal Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Veronika L Tchesnokova; Linda L Ottley; Kyoko Sakamoto; Joshua Fierer; Evgeni Sokurenko; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections.

Authors:  Robin R Chamberland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordon T Walker; Nirmish Singla; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

8.  Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.

Authors:  Matthew J Roberts; Alastair Macdonald; Sachinka Ranasinghe; Harrison Bennett; Patrick E Teloken; Patrick Harris; David Paterson; Geoff Coughlin; Nigel Dunglison; Rachel Esler; Robert A Gardiner; Thomas Elliott; Louisa Gordon; John Yaxley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.554

9.  Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Abdullah Demirtaş; Esma Eren; Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket Tolga Tombul; Emine Alp
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-11-29

10.  Increase of prostate biopsy-related bacteremic complications in southern Finland, 2005-2013: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  K Lahdensuo; A Rannikko; V-J Anttila; A Erickson; A Pätäri-Sampo; M Rautio; H Santti; E Tarkka; M Vaara; K Huotari
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.